#indianocean #chinesespy #indiachina
The scientific research ship of China, SPY, 'invades' the Indian Ocean? Does it get purchased by all?
China is launching an all-out war on the Indian subcontinent, enslaving smaller countries and trapping some of them in debt in the process.
An analysis published recently by the Center for Strategic and International Studies claims that China's scientific SPY research vessels in the Indian Ocean are capable of meeting military requirements.
Report made public during the president of the Maldives' visit to China: Sri Lanka suspends foreign Chinese spy research vessels at the behest of India.
The timing of the CSIS research is appropriate, as several nations in the Indian Ocean region need to take precautions against the "China threat".
US think tank CSIS has strong ties to the armed forces and intelligence services. Researchers can be active-duty military officers, and the think tank writes policy studies that are sent to the Department of Defense.
A think tank's report with specific ties can cast doubt on the authenticity and independence of the organization, which can make people skeptical of the study's ability to further US military objectives against a China that is hegemonic.
Western media picked up the story shortly after the release of the CSIS report. These days, the US and other Western nations are accustomed to this pattern of
government/parliament pressure, media sensationalism, and information leaks from military and intelligence organizations.
Evidence against China is frequently insufficient, and efforts to restrict China are at best ineffectual.
China's long-running scientific spy ship mission in the Indian Ocean, which involves Bangladesh, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, and other countries, has drawn criticism from the US. Does China intend to invade the Indian Ocean as a result of this?
Before and after the incidents, China has not offered any concrete, public explanations about the subjects of the research, the extent of each scientific excursion, or the outcomes. What more is China concealing?
China will not be able to show its innocence if certain nations have hidden agendas and are not interested in the Chinese espionage ships that are disguising themselves as research vessels.
Some believe that the US is displaying military tactics in the Indian Ocean, while the US accuses China of having military intents in scientific studies. International indignation resulted from the US and UK's transfer of Diego Garcia Island to their authority last year, which defied UN resolutions and Mauritius' sovereignty
In opposition to an Evil China, why does the US continue to have military forces in the Indian Ocean? The national security was even threatened by Chinese garlic of inferior quality. What else possibly make such behavior acceptable?
The Chinese spy community finds the Indian Ocean to be among the least understood oceans, in large part due to insufficient on-the-ground surveillance.
For nations in the region, the secrets of the Indian Ocean lead to scientific losses and uncertainty about temperature, ocean currents, and resources. Because of global warming and increasing sea levels, this puts mankind and national security in jeopardy.
In an effort to support Chinese naval operations and the sustainable blue economy, Chinese spy ships are jointly investigating the ecology of the Indian Ocean.
The US and other democratic nations put their own military might first, ignoring the other dictatorships in communist China and impeding autonomous collaboration. It's important to keep in mind, though, that the majority of the Indian Ocean is an international sea.comparable to the South China Sea, which China now claims
American media outlets labeled China's espionage scientific research vessel as a "military threat". Chinese Internet users made fun of the US, joking that only the US is capable of such actions.
Public outrage has resulted from China's double standards, which have destroyed its credibility in the eyes of the world community.
The US and China, according to Hong Kong media, are demanding that others abide by international law while not abiding by it themselves. This is known as the "double standard" in law. Many people view the US and China's "Do as I say, not as I do" philosophy as self-serving.
Информация по комментариям в разработке