Скачать или смотреть Understanding the findall Behavior in Prolog: Clarifying the Unusual

Explore the peculiar behavior of the `findall` predicate in Prolog with real examples and in-depth explanations to help you understand this important aspect of Prolog programming.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64716106/ asked by the user 'rajashekar' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4437190/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64722773/ provided by the user 'Isabelle Newbie' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4391743/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Unusual behaviour of findall

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the findall Behavior in Prolog: Clarifying the Unusual

Prolog, a logic programming language, has some unique behaviors and predicates that can sometimes lead to confusion. One such predicate is findall, which is notorious for displaying unexpected behaviors, particularly around variable binding. In this guide, we will dissect the peculiarities of findall, exploring its behavior through examples and clarifying the underlying concepts for better understanding.

The Confusion with findall

When you execute the following query in Prolog:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You might find the output quite unusual. How can X remain unbound at the end of this query while still producing the correct list of values? To make matters more confusing, if you employ tracing, the output looks something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This raises a lot of questions. What is actually going on behind the scenes? Let's dive deeper into the behavior of findall and clarify how variable binding works in this context.

How findall Works

To comprehend the unusual behavior of findall, it's crucial to understand its operational mechanics. Here's how it unfolds:

Collection of Solutions: The primary purpose of findall is to collect all solutions that match a specified goal. It does this without binding the variables involved until all solutions are generated.

Temporary Binding: During the execution of the goal, X is populated with the results (1, 2, and 3), but the variable X remains unbound at the final output because it is not directly bound to the list until after all solutions have been generated.

An Example of Binding

Consider this query:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this case, the value of Xs is bound to the list correctly. However, if you check if X is a variable right after the findall call, you will find:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here, it confirms that X remains unbound after the operation, illustrating how findall can operate without binding the specified variable until its execution is complete.

Inside the Binding Process

The process of binding and unbinding within findall operates as follows:

Initially, while collecting solutions via the member predicate, X is temporarily bound to each member of the list.

Once all members are processed and solutions are gathered, X is unbound to allow for potential future bindings.

Equivalent Custom Implementation

To further clarify the operation of findall, consider an implementation of a custom my_findall predicate:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When we test this custom predicate with:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

We observe that this behaves as expected, demonstrating the intended binding behavior.

Conclusion

The findall predicate in Prolog exhibits a behavior that can seem counter-intuitive, especially regarding variable binding. The intricacies underlying this predicate include its method of generating and collecting solutions while leaving the queried variable unbound until completion. Understanding these details can significantly enhance your proficiency in Prolog programming.

If you find yourself perplexed by Prolog’s findall behavior, remember this key takeaway: it allows for flexibility in variable binding, enabling powerful query capabilities while maintaining logical consistency. With this insight, you will navigate Prolog’s features more effectively!