Discover effective solutions to fix common issues with `STM32F405` SPI slave communication, including noise reduction, buffer management, and more!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66679047/ asked by the user 'vallum' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8710545/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66814459/ provided by the user 'vallum' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8710545/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: STM32F405 bare metal spi slave - MISO data messed up sometimes
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Troubleshooting STM32F405 SPI Slave: From Garbage Data to Reliable Communication
If you're working with the STM32F405 microcontroller and are experiencing issues with the SPI slave mode—specifically, sending and receiving garbage data—you're not alone. Many developers face communication challenges when setting up SPI. Fortunately, through careful adjustments and strategies, reliable data transmission is achievable. Let’s explore the problem and detailed solutions that can help streamline your SPI communications.
Understanding the Problem
You have set up two STM32 boards, configuring one as the master and the other as the slave for SPI communication. While the master communicates perfectly, the slave occasionally returns garbage data. After initial attempts with interrupts yielded unsatisfactory results, transitioning to DMA seemed to help but did not fully resolve the issue.
Here are the symptoms observed:
Garbage Data: The SPI slave sends incorrect data most often after the fourth or fifth byte when transmitting more than five bytes.
Clean Signals: Signals were visually confirmed to be clean using an oscilloscope, leading to confusion about the data integrity.
Data Reliability: 95% accuracy was achieved when sending shorter packets of 3 to 5 bytes.
Solutions to Fix the Issues
1. Noise Reduction on Data Lines
Initially, it seems the use of an oscilloscope may have introduced noise into the signals. This can happen if the measurement tools affect the circuit's integrity. Instead of relying solely on the oscilloscope for validation, try using less intrusive methods to check the signals, such as using pull-up resistors close to the slave pins rather than the master. This straightforward change improved the data accuracy significantly.
2. Resistor Placement
As found during debugging, the position of resistors on the signal lines plays a crucial role in signal integrity. Here’s a recap of the changes:
Place 100 OHM Resistors near the slave’s pins instead of the master’s. This alteration resolved persistent garbage data transmissions.
3. Implement a Circular Buffer
A circular buffer can manage the data sent to the slave, ensuring that it always sends a fixed length. This strategy is crucial for:
Mitigating errors during DMA resets or shutdowns.
Giving the slave precise expectations on data lengths, thus enhancing communication stability.
4. Handling UART Issues
Sometimes problems might seem like they originate from hardware but are due to the software or tools being used. For instance, terminal programs like GtkTerm may handle excessive data poorly, leading to glitches. If you encounter data mixed or corrupted in the terminal, consider testing with smaller data packets before sending larger streams to prevent overflow and miscommunication.
5. Adjusting SPI Clock Mode
The clock mode can dramatically affect communication quality. In testing, both CPOL and CPH were set to 0, creating unexpected behavior when implemented on the slave and master.
Experiment with other clock configurations, as the slave might struggle to manage even low clock speeds like 100 kHz. Testing different configurations and loopback techniques may help isolate the timing issues between your devices.
Conclusion
Debugging communication issues, especially with SPI protocols, can be daunting. The nuances of hardware setups, software handling, and timing parameters all interconnect to create a stable communication link. By implementing the above strategies—focusing on noise reduction, buffer management, UART handling, and clock configurations—you can significantly improve data integrity between your STM32F405 devices.
I hope this guide assists others facing similar challenges with their SPI
Информация по комментариям в разработке