Скачать или смотреть Understanding Kafka's Offset Management and commitAsync Behavior in Consumer Polling

Learn how Kafka handles offsets with `commitAsync` and how it affects consumer polling in the Kafka consumer API.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63271806/ asked by the user 'user3672677' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3672677/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63272278/ provided by the user 'Rishabh Sharma' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13958041/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How does Kafka provides next batch of records to poll when commitAsync gets failed in committing offset

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Kafka's Offset Management and commitAsync Behavior in Consumer Polling

When dealing with Apache Kafka, especially with the consumer API, understanding how offsets are managed is crucial. A common area of confusion arises around the use of the commitAsync() method, particularly when it fails before the consumer can continue fetching the next set of records. In this post, we will explore the question: How does Kafka provide the next batch of records to poll when commitAsync fails in committing an offset?

The Scenario

Imagine a topic with one partition that holds a series of records. Let’s break down the situation step-by-step:

Your Kafka consumer polls the topic for the first time and retrieves records 0 through 9.

The consumer successfully processes those records.

It then calls commitAsync() to commit the offset for these records to Kafka.

While this commitAsync() request is pending, more records (10 through 19) are added to the partition.

Since commitAsync() is asynchronous, the consumer continues polling for new records.

At this point, we are left wondering how Kafka knows which records the consumer should read next.

How Offsets and Commit Behaves

Understanding Commit Offsets

The offset commit serves as an acknowledgment to the Kafka broker that the consumer has successfully processed a specific message or batch of messages. Importantly, the consumer maintains its own state regarding which records have been processed, independent of the broker's acknowledgment. Here are some key points:

The broker does not know that the consumer has processed records 0 through 9 until it receives an acknowledgment via commitAsync().

The consumer retains the knowledge that it has processed records 0 through 9, therefore it will continue polling from the 10th record onward, despite the outstanding commit request.

Possible Scenarios after Commit Failures

When considering the failure of a commitAsync() call, several scenarios can emerge:

Successful Processing of New Records:

If the commit fails for records 0 through 9, but the consumer next processes records 10 through 15 successfully and commits these offsets, everything remains in a good state. The consumer informs the broker that records up to 15 have been processed, effectively moving forward.

Consumer Down After Failure:

If the commit for records 0 through 9 fails and the consumer processes records 10 through 15 but then crashes before the new offsets are committed, the next time the consumer starts, it will consult the broker for its last committed offset. Since the broker has no record of committing either batch, the consumer will start reading from the beginning (offset 0), losing the progress made after the initial records.

Conclusion

The behavior of Kafka’s consumer and its offset management underlines the importance of committing offsets particularly when restarting the consumer. If a consumer is restarted for any reason, it must retrieve the last successfully processed offset from the Kafka broker to continue where it left off.

In summary, while the commitAsync() method allows for efficient processing, it presents certain challenges when calls fail or when consumers crash. It is vital for developers to implement error handling and offset management strategies to ensure data consistency and reliability when using Kafka.

By understanding how offsets and asynchronous commits work, developers can build more resilient systems that effectively handle real-time data streams. Keep these concepts in mind as you navigate the intricacies of the Kafka consumer API!