Скачать или смотреть GB News Panel FURIOUS As David Lammy Agrees to Huge ECHR Payout for ISLAMIST M*RDERER!

Patrick Christys leads a furious panel discussion exposing the sickening reality of the British justice system, where an Islamist double murderer has been awarded a staggering £240,000 in taxpayer cash.

Fuad Awale, a killer who took a prison officer hostage and idolizes the murderers of Lee Rigby, successfully sued the government because solitary confinement made him "depressed" and violated his right to a "private life" under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

In this explosive segment, Patrick reveals a shocking conflict of interest: the barrister who represented the terrorist is Dan Squires KC, the husband of current Labour Minister Sarah Sackman.

While Justice Secretary David Lammy refused to appeal the decision, ordinary Britons are left footing the bill. The panel—including Adam Brooks and Linda Duberley—asks the ultimate question: Has the ECHR become a charter for criminals? And is it finally time for the UK to repeal the Human Rights Act and take back control of our borders and prisons?

Topics Covered:
The £240,000 payout to Islamist killer Fuad Awale.
The connection between the terrorist's lawyer and the Labour Government.
Why David Lammy surrendered rather than fighting the ECHR ruling.
The debate: Should the UK leave the European Court of Human Rights immediately?

👇 Let us know in the comments: Is this treason or just incompetence?

SOURCE ATTRIBUTION
This video features original footage from GB News. We strongly encourage viewers to support the original broadcaster. This video is a transformative work of commentary, criticism, and educational analysis regarding the political implications of this specific news event.

FAIR USE DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.