Скачать или смотреть Creatine Ethyl Ester Vs. Monohydrate

► THE BODY TRANSFORMATION BLUEPRINT
Science-based muscle building and fat loss system:
http://www.BodyTransformationTruth.com

► REALSCIENCE ATHLETICS
No B.S, premium quality supplements you can trust:
http://www.RealScienceAthletics.com

CONNECT WITH ME
Blog: http://www.SeanNal.com
Instagram:   / sean_nalewanyj  
Facebook:   / seannalewanyjofficial  

GET YOUR FREE CUSTOM MEAL PLAN
http://www.SeanNal.com/free-meal-plan...

TAKE MY ONLINE FITNESS QUIZ
http://www.SeanNal.com/quiz-questions...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free 28-Day Fast Mass Building Plan:
http://www.SeanNal.com/28-Day-Mass-Plan

MuscleAmp Bodybuilding Formula:
http://www.SeanNal.com/EIL.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Video Summary:

Creatine Ethyl Ester Vs. Monohydrate
http://www.SeanNal.com/articles/suppl...

The number of different creatine variations available these days has reached massive proportions, with a new "breakthrough" creatine being released every year or so. Creatine ethyl ester ("CEE" for short) is one of the most recent versions available, and has become quite popular as a bodybuilding supplement.

But is creatine ethyl ester better than regular creatine monohydrate? Is creatine ethyl ester effective for building muscle size and strength?

The makers of these products list of a ton of different creatine ethyl ester benefits, such as the claim that it is more absorbable, safer and doesn't cause bloating or cramps. In reality, this is nothing more than marketing hype.

First off, regular creatine monohydrate is already highly absorbable in the human body, and it does not cause bloating or cramps like many people claim. Supplement companies that make these statements are simply creating invented problems in order to sell you on some "superior" alternative.

Not only that, but we now have concrete research comparing creatine ethyl ester vs. monohydrate that clearly demonstrates that CEE is not superior in any way, and that it is actually less stable and more likely to be converted to the waste product creatinine in comparison to monohydrate.

At the end of the day, this one is really a no-brainer. Despite what many over-hyped creatine ethyl ester reviews might say (which are almost always put out by people who have a financial interest in it) CEE is inferior to monohydrate and does not provide any benefits that you can't get from using standard creatine. Not only that, but CEE is also much more expensive and you'll actually end up paying quite a bit more on a gram for gram basis.

So, creatine ethyl ester or monohydrate? I think the choice is pretty obvious.