Скачать или смотреть How to Await the Outermost Async Function in Python

Discover the best practices to `await` asynchronous functions in Python, especially when dealing with the `SyntaxError: 'await' outside function`.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65103086/ asked by the user 'Dan D.' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5581893/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65103289/ provided by the user 'HTF' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1416672/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Python: await the outer most async function

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Await the Outermost Async Function in Python

Python's asynchronous programming capabilities, introduced in version 3.5 and enhanced in later releases, allow developers to write code that runs concurrently. However, it comes with its quirks—notably, the challenge of awaiting the outermost async function. This post delves into the solution, making it easy for you to implement asynchronous programming without stumbling on common syntax errors.

Understanding the Problem

When working with async functions in Python, you might encounter the following error:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This error occurs because you cannot directly await an async function at the top level of your script. Instead, you need to call it from within an appropriate context, such as an event loop. In this guide, we will explore the recommended way to handle this issue effectively.

Example of the Problem

Consider the following code snippet that aims to await an asynchronous function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

As illustrated, trying to await f() directly results in a SyntaxError. So, how do we correctly execute this asynchronous function?

Solution: Using asyncio.run()

Starting from Python 3.7, the recommended approach to run async functions is to use asyncio.run(). This function creates a new event loop, runs the specified coroutine, and then closes the loop. Let's see how to implement this.

Corrected Code Example

Here’s how you can adjust your code using asyncio.run() to avoid the syntax error:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Steps Explained

Define Your Async Function: Use the async keyword before your function definition. In this case, f().

Use await for Calls Inside Async Function: Inside f(), you can use await to pause execution until aio.sleep() completes.

Run Your Async Function: Replace the direct print(await f()) call with print(aio.run(f())). This runs f() in the correct context and handles the event loop management for you.

Conclusion

Using asyncio.run() makes working with asynchronous functions in Python more straightforward and manageable. It not only resolves the SyntaxError but also encapsulates the function call within its own event loop context, streamlining your asynchronous programming experience. As you build your Python programs, remember that embracing async features can significantly enhance efficiency, especially when working on I/O-bound tasks.

For further exploration, consider looking into more advanced async programming concepts like error handling within co-routines, cancellation tokens, and parallel execution of multiple async tasks.

Feel free to leave your thoughts or questions in the comments below as you embark on your journey with asynchronous Python!