Скачать или смотреть Understanding set -eo pipefail: Why Your Shell Script Might Not Work as Expected

Explore the challenges of using `set -eo pipefail` in shell scripts, and learn how sourcing scripts can improve your execution success rate.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63128067/ asked by the user 'nyx19' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14007501/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63128459/ provided by the user 'John1024' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3030305/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Can't successfully call any external shell script in pipe with set -eo pipefail

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding set -eo pipefail: Why Your Shell Script Might Not Work as Expected

When working with shell scripts in Linux, a common issue developers face is the challenge of piping commands together, particularly when using set -eo pipefail. This combination is meant to enhance error handling by exiting immediately if any command in the pipeline fails. However, many users find their scripts do not always behave as expected, especially when calling other shell scripts from within these pipes. In this guide, we will explore this problem in detail and discuss practical solutions to improve script execution reliability.

The Problem

Consider a shell script called test-pipefail.sh which includes the command:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Along with echoer.sh:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When you run test-pipefail.sh, you might expect to see:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, you often see only:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

or sometimes no output at all. This inconsistency leads to confusion, particularly when using scripts instead of binary utilities, which seem to execute flawlessly.

The Root of the Issue

The underlying cause boils down to how pipes and processes interact in a shell environment. In simpler terms:

When head consumes output from echoer.sh, it finishes its task and closes the pipe.

This closure sends a SIGPIPE signal to the previous command (cat in a simplified example), which can cause it to terminate unexpectedly.

Timing Matters

The variable timing between your scripts means that sometimes echoer.sh will finish executing before head closes the pipe, while other times it doesn't, leading to confusion as noted above.

Solution Approaches

1. Sourcing vs. Executing

One excellent approach to mitigate the issues associated with process timing is to source the script instead of executing it:

By changing from:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

to:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This method reduces overhead and tends to improve the probability of echoer.sh completing before head closes the pipe. The potential results appear more stable, leading to more consistent script outcomes.

2. Understanding Binary Programs

If you're using a binary utility instead of a shell script (like cat vs echoer.sh), you may not face the same issues since binary programs behave differently with respect to process termination. For instance, if cat /dev/zero is used, it never finishes and will not immediately send a SIGPIPE, allowing a more desirable outcome.

Conclusion

To sum up, the challenges of using set -eo pipefail in conjunction with shell scripts are primarily timing-related. Understanding how the command execution order affects your script's behavior, and employing the strategy of sourcing scripts will help ensure smoother and more reliable execution outcomes.

By implementing these insights, you can significantly improve the performance and reliability of your shell scripts, resulting in fewer unexpected issues and more robust error handling in your pipelines.

If you find yourself struggling with similar issues, don't hesitate to apply these techniques in your own scripts to harness the full potential of shell scripting!