Скачать или смотреть Debugging Input Issues in Verilog Testbenches: Understanding casez Behavior

Explore common issues with `Verilog` testbenches, specifically when using `casez`. Learn how to fix output problems related to `z` inputs.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/73728633/ asked by the user '余昌翰' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11346735/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/73731252/ provided by the user 'toolic' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/197758/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Use testbench to check module but output does not change when I use other input

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Debugging Input Issues in Verilog Testbenches: Understanding casez Behavior

If you have ever run a Verilog testbench only to find that the output does not change despite different inputs, you are not alone. This situation can be perplexing, especially when you expect to see varied results based on the inputs you provide.

In this guide, we'll dissect a common problem that arises when using the casez statement in conjunction with z state inputs. We’ll provide clear solutions and clarify how to avoid getting stuck in similar situations in the future.

The Problem Statement

In the scenario described, an individual has created a module coded for an encoder and a corresponding testbench. Despite supplying multiple inputs to the module, the output always remains constant, reflecting only the result of the first input. This situation raises a crucial question: Why does the output not change when other inputs are supplied?

Here’s a simplified look at the provided Verilog code:

The Encoder Module

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Testbench

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When run, the testbench produces output indicating that pos remains constant at 001, despite the assertion that different inputs are being fed to the encoder.

Understanding Why the Issue Occurs

casez Behavior with z States

Your output is always reflecting the first input because the casez statement is treating z bits as do-not-care conditions. When the variable in contains z bits, the first match found by the casez evaluation locks the output to the associated result. As such, since 4'bzzz1 is the first case and matches any in input with the potential for z, the output will never transition past the first case as far as the input changes are concerned.

IEEE Standard Explanation

According to the IEEE Std 1800-2017, the casez statement compares bits with z and x as do-not-cares. This means any z in in will match the first case item (4'bzzz1), leading to the output being stuck at pos = 1.

Solutions to the Problem

Here are some actions you can take to resolve this issue and allow your output to reflect changes in the inputs correctly:

1. Update the Case Statement

One potential fix is to change the casez to a regular case. This approach would ignore the z bits altogether; however, it might not be the most suitable if your design relies on z conditions.

Update your encoder to use ? in place of z in your case items:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Avoid Using z in Test Inputs

It is recommended to provide known values for your inputs instead of using z. Consider this modified testbench:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This change ensures that your testbench only uses defined values (0s and 1s), allowing each input to produce a distinct output.

Conclusion

Debugging issues within Verilog testbenches can be frustrating, especially when the output seems static despite changing inputs. By understanding the behavior of casez and avoiding problematic usage of z, you can achieve the desired flexibility and accuracy in your test results. Always ensure that your inputs are defined explicitly when running tests to streamline your debugging process.



By using these practices, you can easily navigate the complexities of Verilog design and troubleshooting, leading to more effective simulations and successful coding outcomes. Happy coding!