Скачать или смотреть How to Fit Mutable Static Arrays in a Lazy Static Context without Mutex Jujitsu in Rust

Discover how to resolve the issue of fitting mutable static arrays of different sizes into a lazy static context in Rust without excessive complexity. Get clear, step-by-step instructions and examples!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/77289454/ asked by the user 'eguneys' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3994249/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/77289557/ provided by the user 'cafce25' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/442760/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to fit mutable static array of two different size in lazy static context without any Mutex jujitsu

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Fit Mutable Static Arrays in a Lazy Static Context without Mutex Jujitsu in Rust

Rust is known for its strict safety guarantees, but sometimes developers encounter tricky situations when trying to manage mutable static data. One such problem involves fitting mutable static arrays of different sizes into a lazy static context without invoking complex patterns like mutex jujitsu. In this post, we’ll explore a common error that arises during this endeavor and how to resolve it efficiently.

The Problem

Suppose you're trying to create two mutable static arrays—one for rook pieces and one for bishop pieces—using Rust's lazy_static crate. You might run into a compilation error similar to this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This error indicates that the BISHOP_TABLE does not satisfy the required trait bounds for the static reference to be properly dereferenced. Essentially, the compiler cannot automatically dereference the static ref object to get a reference to the mutex.

The Solution

The solution to this problem revolves around explicitly dereferencing the static ref within your lazy_static block.

Step-by-Step Breakdown

Define the Static Structures: First, ensure that you have your Mutex wrapped static arrays defined properly.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Modify the Initialization of Magic: You’ll need to modify the way you initialize your Magic for both ROOK_MAGICS and BISHOP_MAGICS.

Instead of directly passing the &BISHOP_TABLE, dereference it using *, like so:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Why This Works

The lazy_static! macro introduces a unique type for each static ref, which means that the compiler can't infer how to treat the references unless explicitly directed. By using * to dereference the mutex, you're instructing the compiler to treat the ROOK_TABLE and BISHOP_TABLE as their inner type, which in turn implements the BitboardTable trait.

Conclusion

In summary, while working with mutable static arrays in Rust might seem straightforward, subtle issues can arise due to the language's strict type system. The key takeaway is to ensure you are adequately dereferencing your lazy static references where necessary to avoid compilation issues.

By following the outlined solution and adjusting how you initialize your static references, you can successfully set up mutable static arrays in lazy static contexts without falling into the trap of mutex complexity. Happy coding!