Скачать или смотреть Understanding Why Updating an Empty Dictionary Inside a List Affects All Elements

Discover the surprising behavior of Python lists and dictionaries when updating elements. Learn how to avoid changes propagating across your list of empty dictionaries.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63106261/ asked by the user 'SadHak' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4687736/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63106344/ provided by the user 'Diana' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13978286/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Updating an empty dictionary inside a list of dictionaries changes all elements of the list

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Why Updating an Empty Dictionary Inside a List Affects All Elements

Have you ever encountered unexpected behavior while working with lists and dictionaries in Python? A common issue arises when updating an empty dictionary contained in a list of dictionaries, leading to surprising outcomes that can baffle even seasoned developers. This guide will explain why such changes affect all elements in the list and provide you with a clear solution to avoid this pitfall.

The Problem

Consider the following example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When you run this code, you might expect the output to reflect that only the first dictionary has been updated:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, the actual output is:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This might leave you puzzled—why does the value of "name" appear in all dictionaries?

The Reason Behind the Behavior

The key to understanding this behavior lies in how Python handles object references:

When you initialize my_list with [{}] * 5, you are not creating five distinct dictionaries. Instead, you create a single empty dictionary and reference it five times in the list.

Consequently, when you update one of the dictionaries, you're effectively updating the same dictionary across all references. Thus, all elements in the list reflect this change.

The Solution

To achieve the desired behavior—where only one dictionary is updated—you need to create independent dictionaries. This can be achieved using a list comprehension. Here's how you can do it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With this line of code, you create five distinct (empty) dictionaries. Now, let's revisit the code using this approach:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Expected Output

When you run this revised code, the output will be as you initially expected:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Summary: Avoiding Reference Issues

Here’s a quick breakdown to remember:

Understanding References: Using [{}] * n creates a list of references to a single object. Thus, changes affect all references.

Creating Independent Objects: Use a list comprehension like [dict() for _ in range(n)] to ensure each list element is a unique dictionary.

By implementing these strategies, you’ll avoid confusing behavior in your future Python programming.

Now you're equipped to handle lists of dictionaries in Python without running into unexpected issues. Happy coding!