Скачать или смотреть Effective Methods to Avoid Code Duplication While Checking Subsequences

Discover strategies to eliminate code duplication in Java when finding maximum subsequences with given constraints.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68836468/ asked by the user 'vszholobov' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15777370/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68837051/ provided by the user 'Andy Turner' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3788176/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Duplicate condition after loop when checking subsequences

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Effective Methods to Avoid Code Duplication While Checking Subsequences

When working with coding challenges, especially in Java, you might encounter scenarios where you inadvertently repeat your logic. A common example is when checking for subsequences in an array. In this guide, we will delve into a specific problem: efficiently finding the maximum subsequence of numbers with a difference of no more than one, all while avoiding code duplication.

The Problem Explained

Imagine you have an array of integers, and you're tasked with identifying the longest contiguous subsequence where the difference between the maximum and minimum values is at most one. The challenge arises when you realize that part of your logic appears multiple times, particularly at the end of your loop. You may find yourself duplicating conditions that check for maximum subsequence counts.

The Original Code

Here’s a simplified version of the code that illustrates the duplication issue:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, the last conditional check is crucial but unnecessarily repeated. If the sequence ends with a valid subsequence, it won’t be counted, prompting the duplication to ensure it's accounted for.

A Cleaner Solution

To tackle this problem without changing the input or duplicating code, we can utilize a two-pointer approach. Here’s how you can do it efficiently:

Two-Pointer Strategy

Initialization:

Create a start pointer to track the beginning of your subsequence.

Use an end pointer to extend as far as possible while maintaining the condition about the differences.

Loop Structure:

Iterate through the list using the start pointer. For each position of the start, increment the end pointer until you can't maintain the condition anymore.

Evaluate Consequences:

After finding a subsequence defined by start and end, check its length.

If it’s the longest found so far, remember this start index and its count.

Moving Forward:

Update the position of the start pointer to the end pointer for the next iteration and repeat.

Revised Code Implementation

Here’s how the streamlined code would look:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By applying the two-pointer technique, we eliminate code duplication effectively and retain clarity in our logic. The enhanced readability and reduced redundancy not only improve our code’s maintainability but also bolster its performance.

So next time you find yourself duplicating code to manage conditions, consider whether a different iteration strategy, like using two pointers, could serve your needs better!

If you have any questions or comments about the approach discussed, feel free to share!