Скачать или смотреть Understanding Compiler Behavior with requires Expressions in C++

Dive into the nuances of `requires` expressions in C++20 and uncover why different compilers may yield different results when evaluating your code.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/74932961/ asked by the user 'canardanonyme' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/20873810/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/74933047/ provided by the user 'Barry' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2069064/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why do different compilers behave differently with these requires expressions?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Exploring Compiler Behavior with requires Expressions in C++

When coding in C++, you've likely encountered the concept of requires expressions, especially with the introduction of C++20. However, developers faced an intriguing puzzle: Why do different compilers behave differently when working with these expressions? This question leads us to explore the intricacies of compiler implementation and the underlying principles governing these behaviors.

The Problem: Compiler Inconsistency

When trying to define a Oneable concept using requires, some implementations compile on specific compilers while others do not. Here, we’ll examine three distinct versions of the Oneable concept and analyze why they yield different compilation results across popular compilers like Clang, GCC, and MSVC.

Example Implementations of the Oneable Concept

Simple Assignment Expression

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Outcome: Compiles on Clang, GCC, and MSVC.

Lambda Expression with an Assignment Statement

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Outcome: Compiles on Clang and MSVC but fails on GCC.

Struct Instantiation

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Outcome: Compiles on GCC and MSVC but fails on Clang.

Understanding the Underlying Issues

The differences in compilation outcomes stem from the concept of immediate context and the SFINAE principle (Substitution Failure Is Not An Error). Let’s break this down further.

Immediate Context Explained

Definition: The immediate context refers to where a substitution failure occurs during template instantiation. If problems arise in the immediate context (like function signatures), they're gracefully handled by C++. However, if they arise in the body, as is the case with some expressions, they are treated as hard compilation errors.

Analyzing the Failure Points

Lambda Expression Issue:

In the second attempt with the lambda, when T = int*, the issue occurs in the lambda body, making it a hard error for GCC.

This means the compiler cannot check if int* is assignable to an int in a graceful manner since lambdas fall outside the immediate context.

Struct Definition Complications:

In the third attempt, while GCC allows n to be initialized, Clang fails because it doesn’t treat the default member initializers as part of the immediate context. This inconsistency leads to confusion among developers.

A Best Practice Solution

To navigate the nuances of requires expressions across compilers and prevent such issues, follow these guidelines:

Avoid Ambiguous Situations: Write code that is clear and unambiguous. For example, prefer defining constraints directly in the concept rather than relying on default member initializers or complex expressions.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

In conclusion, the variation in behavior among different compilers when handling requires expressions is deeply intertwined with the concept of immediate context and template specialization rules. By understanding these principles, developers can make informed choices that maximize compatibility across compilers. Embrace clear coding practices and steer towards reliable constructs for consistent compilation and functionality.

Hopefully, this exploration provides clarity and assists in your C++ development endeavors.