Скачать или смотреть Solving the TypeError in Django Rest Framework Nested Serializers

Discover effective strategies to handle the `TypeError` issue in Django Rest Framework (DRF) when working with nested serializers. Learn how to correct the problem and ensure smooth user and school registration in your application.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/71021145/ asked by the user 'rediet yosef' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14742111/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/71024109/ provided by the user 'Jack' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13239055/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: DRF: nested Serializer error on create argument after ** must be a mapping, not str

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving the TypeError in Django Rest Framework Nested Serializers: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

If you're a developer working with Django Rest Framework (DRF), you may encounter numerous challenges while building and managing your API. One common issue arises when attempting to use nested serializers. Specifically, the error message TypeError: argument after ** must be a mapping, not str can be puzzling. In this guide, we'll dive into the details of this error, why it occurs, and how to solve it effectively when registering a user with a nested serializer.

Understanding the Problem

Your Django model setup involves a connection between a User model and a School model through an Applied model. This relationship allows you to create a user instance while simultaneously linking it to a specific school. However, the error mentioned often indicates a problem in how data is being unpacked in your serializer's create method.

The Error Source

Consider this snippet from your implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The line attempts to unpack elements presumed to be dictionaries. However, if you're not handling the data correctly, applies may actually be a string rather than a dictionary. This is where the error is generated, since the unpacking operator ** can only be used with mappings (like dictionaries), not strings.

Solution

Step 1: Modifying the Serializer

To rectify this issue, you first need to ensure that the applied field of your RegisterSerializerStudent is properly configured. If you're sending only one "applied" object, your StudentSchoolSerializer should not need the many=True option. Adjust the create method as follows:

Change:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

To:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This line effectively extracts the single applied instance rather than assuming it is a list.

Step 2: Creating the Applied Instance

Instead of looping over applied, you can directly create the Applied instance since there is only one. Modify the create method in your serializer to the following:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Full Revised create Method

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By understanding the error and correctly adjusting the implementation of your nested serializers in Django Rest Framework, you can resolve the issue efficiently. The key takeaway is to ensure the data structure you are using with the unpacking operator ** is in the expected format (a dictionary, not a string). Follow the steps outlined above, and successfully create both user and associated school instances without encountering the TypeError.

Happy coding!