Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Use of the all Keyword in VHDL Clocked Process Sensitivity Lists

Explore whether the `all` keyword can be used in the sensitivity list of clocked VHDL processes, its implications, and the differences between synthesis and simulation.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/75768250/ asked by the user 'jakeh12' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3399053/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/75768444/ provided by the user 'Tricky' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8567231/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Using keyword `all` in a sensitivity list of a clocked VHDL process

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Exploring the Use of all in VHDL Clocked Process Sensitivity Lists

When working with VHDL for digital circuit design, one might come across questions regarding the best practices and rules surrounding sensitivity lists. A specific point of contention is whether the keyword all can be used in the sensitivity list of a clocked process. This guide aims to clarify this issue and explain its implications in both simulation and synthesis environments.

Understanding Sensitivity Lists

What Are Sensitivity Lists?

In VHDL, a sensitivity list is used in processes to indicate which signals should trigger the process when they change. For example, if you have a process that should be responsive to a clock and a reset signal, your sensitivity list would typically contain these signals.

The Traditional Approach

Consider the following example of a flip-flop implementation, where both the clock (i_clk) and reset (i_rst) are explicitly listed in the sensitivity list:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this case, the process will react to changes in either the clock or the reset, ensuring your flip-flop operates as expected.

The Use of the all Keyword

What Happens When You Use all?

The code example below demonstrates using the all keyword in the sensitivity list:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This approach instructs VHDL synthesis tools to infer the sensitivity list automatically. Here are some important considerations regarding this method:

Synthesis Tools: Most synthesis tools like Intel Quartus do not rely on sensitivity lists for clocked processes as they usually infer synchronous and asynchronous logic patterns automatically. Hence, using all does not typically present issues in synthesis, as these tools follow templates to create the necessary circuitry.

Simulation Environment: In simulators, using all means that the process will only reevaluate when a signal in the sensitivity list changes. If you specify all, what the simulator infers may not match the designer's intentions—if not all relevant signals are included, you could have unexpected behavior.

Pros and Cons of Using all

Advantages

Simplicity: Using all can simplify the code by reducing verbosity, especially when multiple signals are involved.

Convenience: It allows for flexibility in tweaking your designs without needing to adjust the sensitivity list manually.

Disadvantages

Potential Confusion: It may lead to misunderstandings among designers who expect the traditional sensitivity list to be strictly followed.

Dependency on Tools: Not all tools treat the all keyword in the same way, which may cause inconsistent behavior across different environments.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while it is technically acceptable to use the all keyword in the sensitivity list of a clocked VHDL process, it is essential to be aware of the differences in how synthesis tools and simulators operate. If you're working primarily with synthesis, using all may not pose problems. However, for simulation purposes, ensure that your process correctly responds to all necessary signals to avoid any design issues.

Ultimately, whether you choose to use all or explicitly define your sensitivity list may come down to personal or project conventions, coding standards, and the specific requirements of the design at hand.

Feel free to share your thoughts or experiences on using the all keyword in VHDL programming!