How Not to Argue for the Resurrection of Jesus

There's a common mistake that Christian apologists make when arguing for the historicity of Jesus' resurrection. They will pile on more and more evidence that the disciples believed in the physical, bodily resurrection. But they leave out further details for the disciples' reasons because they avoid defending the Gospel accounts. The four Gospels give us the most detailed accounts about how Jesus' resurrection was physical, but if we can't argue that they're not embellished, we've hamstrung our own argument. We need a stronger approach than the minimal facts.

For more: Why arguing that the disciples believed is not enough, Lydia McGrew    • Why arguing that the disciples believ...  

An irony of minimalism in defending the resurrection, Lydia McGrew (especially see some of the exchanges in the comments) http://whatswrongwiththeworld.net/202...

Help support me: Patreon   / isjesusalive  . You can also do a one-time donation at paypal.me/isjesusalive

Join this channel to get access to perks:
   / @testifyapologetics  

Get merch: https://is-jesus-alive.creator-spring...

Visit my blog: isjesusalive.com