Скачать или смотреть The Otto Von Habsburg Code!?

Selon les soi-disant Dossiers secrets(Les Descendants mérovingiens: ou l'Énigme du Razès wisigoth"1965"attribué à Madeleine Blancassall ),les hypothétiques descendants de Sigebert IV Fils de Dagobert II étaient des Ariens !!?.Explorons les ariens et l'arianisme(Le monothéisme relatif...)
https://www.facebook.com/saci.abdo.98/post...
--------------------------
By positing a single omnipotent and supreme God - a God who did not incarnate in the flesh, and did not suffer humiliation and death at the hands of his creation Arius effectively embedded Christianity in an essentially Judaic framework. And he may well, as a resident of Alexandria, have been influenced by Judaic teachings there - the teachings of the Ebionites, for example. At the same time the supreme God of Arianism enjoyed immense appeal in the West. As Christianity came to acquire increasingly secular power, such a God became increasingly attractive. Kings and potentates could identify with such a God more readily than they could with a meek, passive deity who submitted without resistance to martyrdom and eschewed contact with the world.

Although Arianism was condemned at the Council of Nicea in 325, Constantinc had always been sympathetic toward it and became more so at the end of his life. On his death his son and successor, Constantius, became unabashedly Arian, and under his auspices councils were convened that drove orthodox Church leaders into exile. By 360 Arianism had all but displaced Roman Christianity. And though it was officially condemned again in 381, it continued to thrive and gain adherents. When the Merovingians rose to power during the fifth century, virtually every bishopric in Christendom was either Arian or vacant. Among the most fervent devotees of Arianism were the Goths, who had been converted to it from paganism during the fourth century. The Suevi, the Lombards, the Alans, the Vandals, the Burgundians, the Ostrogoths were all Arian. So were the Visigoths, who, when they sacked Rome in 480, spared Christian churches. If the early Merovingians, prior to Clovis, were at all receptive to Christianity, it would have been the Arian Christianity of their immediate neighbors, the Visigoths and Burgundians.
Under Visigoth auspices Arianism became the dominant form of Christianity in Spain, the Pyrenees, and what is now southern France. If Jesus’ family did indeed find refuge in Gaul, their overlords, by the fifth century, would have been the Arian Visigoths. Under an Arian regime the family is not likely to have been persecuted. It would probably have been highly esteemed and might well have intermarried with Visigoth nobility before its subsequent intermarriage with the Franks to produce the Merovingians. And with Visigoth patronage and protection it would have been secure against all threats from Rome. It is thus not particularly surprising that unmistakably Semitic names—Bera, for instance—occur among Visigoth aristocracy and royalty. Dagobert II married a Visigoth princess whose father was named Bera. The name Bera recurs repeatedly in the Visigoth-Merovingian family tree descended from Dagobert II and Sigisbert IV. The Roman Church is said to have declared that Dagobert’s son had converted to Arianism(2), and it would not be very extraordinary if he had done so. Despite the pact between the Church and Clovis, the Merovingians had always been sympathetic to Arianism. One of Clovis’ grandsons, Chilperic, made no secret of his Arian proclivities.
If Arianism was not inimical to Judaism, neither was it to Islam, which rose so meteorically in the seventh century. The Arian view of Jesus was quite in accord with that of the Koran. In the Koran Jesus is mentioned no less than thirty-five times, under a number of impressive appellations including "Messenger of God" and "Messiah." At no point, however, is he regarded as anything other than a mortal prophet, a forerunner of Muhammad, and a spokesman for a single supreme God. And like Basilides and Mani, the Koran maintains that Jesus did not die on the cross: "they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him, but they thought they did."(3).The Koran itself does not elaborate on this ambiguous statement, but Islamic commentators do. According to most of them there was a substitute generally, though not always, supposed to have been Simon of Cyrene. Certain Muslim writers speak of Jesus hiding in a niche of a wall and watching the crucifixion of a surrogate—which concurs with the fragment already quoted from the Nag Hammadi scrolls.
---------------------
(2) : Blancasall, Les Descendants, p. 9.
(3) : Koran, 4:157.
The source : The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail(1982).Chapter 14 :The Grail Dynasty