Скачать или смотреть Can a stack allocated Rust buffer be safely accessed through C+ + ?

Discover whether a stack allocated Rust buffer can be accessed safely from C+ + , and get best practices for implementation!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66503106/ asked by the user 'Gatonito' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5884503/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66509233/ provided by the user 'Matthieu M.' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/147192/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Can a stack allocated Rust buffer be accessed through C+ + ?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Can a stack allocated Rust buffer be accessed through C+ + ?

In world where languages like Rust and C+ + often must communicate seamlessly, many developers may find themselves pondering the question: Can a stack allocated Rust buffer be accessed through C+ + ? This concern arises when optimizing for performance and memory management, especially when aiming to avoid heap allocations in scenarios such as networking or low-level operations. Let’s explore this topic in detail.

Understanding the Problem

In Rust, the desire to avoid heap allocations has led many to create stack allocated buffers. A typical example may involve defining a buffer for incoming data packets, as illustrated by the following Rust function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, a C+ + function openvpn_client_receive_just is called, intending to fill this Rust buffer. The critical question arises: Is this safe?

The Safety of Stack Allocated Buffers

Can It Be Done?

Yes, a stack allocated buffer can indeed be accessed via C+ + code. From a type-system perspective, there is no difference between buffer allocations, whether they are static, stack, or heap based. The C signature processes pointers and sizes without caring about the allocation type.

Is It Safe?

The short answer is most likely. The safety hinges largely on the following conditions:

Buffer Bounds: The C+ + function must handle buffer bounds correctly, meaning it should not write beyond the allocated stack space.

Correct Implementation: If there are defects in the C+ + implementation and it exceeds the buffer’s limit, this constitutes a bug that can lead to undefined behavior.

A Note on Unsafe Practices

Although stack buffers are smaller and can lead to better performance, be aware that writing out of bounds—whether to stack or heap—can yield undefined behavior:

Heap Allocated Alternative: Some argue that using heap-allocated buffers may offer more safety in certain contexts. However, it’s important to recognize that misuse will lead to vulnerabilities and errors regardless of allocation type.

Adding Security with Guard Pages

For those particularly concerned about pointer safety, consider the following advanced technique:

Guard Pages: Allocate three contiguous OS pages (commonly 4 KB on x86). Mark the first and last page as read-only, placing your buffer in between. Any improper writes to the buffer will result in an OS-triggered error. Note that while this adds robustness, it does come with increased complexity.

Improving Your Rust Code

Fixing Null Pointer Usage

In the previously mentioned Rust code example, using a null pointer for tracking the number of bytes written is suboptimal. A better approach would involve employing a mutable variable:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Adopting Idiomatic Rust Style

While the original code may function correctly, embracing a more idiomatic Rust style leads to clearer, more maintainable code. For instance:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this refined example, unnecessary annotations are minimized, while preconditions for unsafe code are clearly delineated—an excellent practice for eventual audits.

Conclusion

In summary, accessing a stack allocated Rust buffer from C+ + is entirely feasible and can be safe if certain precautions are observed. By ensuring your C+ + code respects buffer boundaries and maintaining best practices in your Rust implementation, you can leverage the strengths of both languages effectively. When it comes to performance-critical applications, thoughtful memory management and coding style can make a substantial difference in overall system reliability.