Logo video2dn
  • Сохранить видео с ютуба
  • Категории
    • Музыка
    • Кино и Анимация
    • Автомобили
    • Животные
    • Спорт
    • Путешествия
    • Игры
    • Люди и Блоги
    • Юмор
    • Развлечения
    • Новости и Политика
    • Howto и Стиль
    • Diy своими руками
    • Образование
    • Наука и Технологии
    • Некоммерческие Организации
  • О сайте

Скачать или смотреть On Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (2023) - Version 2

  • Education 101
  • 2025-11-26
  • 7
On Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (2023) - Version 2
  • ok logo

Скачать On Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (2023) - Version 2 бесплатно в качестве 4к (2к / 1080p)

У нас вы можете скачать бесплатно On Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (2023) - Version 2 или посмотреть видео с ютуба в максимальном доступном качестве.

Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Cкачать музыку On Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (2023) - Version 2 бесплатно в формате MP3:

Если иконки загрузки не отобразились, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если у вас возникли трудности с загрузкой, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с нами по контактам, указанным в нижней части страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса video2dn.com

Описание к видео On Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (2023) - Version 2

This video explores the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (2023) and the deep constitutional divide it revealed over race-conscious college admissions. We examine the reasoning of the majority and concurring Justices, who held that race-based admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. The Court concluded that the universities failed to demonstrate that the educational benefits of diversity are defined with sufficient clarity or can be measured in a way that satisfies the demanding standards of constitutional review. In the majority’s view, the lack of concrete goals and endpoints rendered these programs unconstitutional. In contrast, the dissenting Justices argued that the decision disregards the enduring legacy of systemic racism in the United States and the ongoing racial inequalities that remain embedded in society. The dissenters maintained that race-conscious admissions are necessary to address these realities and that diversity in education represents a compelling governmental interest. They defended holistic admissions programs as careful, limited, and responsible policies designed to foster equal opportunity rather than impose racial classifications for their own sake. Finally, the episode addresses a notable feature of the Court’s ruling: its deliberate refusal to decide whether similar race-conscious practices are constitutional at U.S. military academies. The Court acknowledged that the national security context may implicate distinct considerations, leaving that question unresolved. This discussion unpacks the constitutional arguments, the competing visions of equality, and the broader implications of the decision for higher education, civil rights law, and the future of diversity policies in the United States.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео

  • О нас
  • Контакты
  • Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer
  • Условия использования сайта - TOS
  • Политика конфиденциальности

video2dn Copyright © 2023 - 2025

Контакты для правообладателей [email protected]