Скачать или смотреть How to Prevent Duplicate Emails in a RabbitMQ Message Queue System

Learn how to effectively manage message delivery and avoid duplicates when sending emails to a large number of users in your RabbitMQ architecture.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70861640/ asked by the user 'Prim' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/658209/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70863840/ provided by the user 'Levi Ramsey' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5641244/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Prevent duplicate messages

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Prevent Duplicate Emails in a RabbitMQ Message Queue System

When dealing with high-volume messaging systems, especially when sending emails to large user bases, it's crucial to ensure that each user only receives one email per content trigger. However, issues can arise, particularly if your application experiences downtime during message processing. In this guide, we’ll tackle the complexities surrounding the prevention of duplicate messages within a RabbitMQ message queuing architecture and present a solution that balances efficiency and reliability.

The Challenge

You are managing a producer application that sends out emails to potentially one million users based on specific content triggers. The architecture includes leveraging RabbitMQ as a message broker, but the problem emerges when the producer fails or is redeployed, leading to the potential for sending duplicate emails to the same users.

Common Pitfall: Duplicate Emails

Downtime Concerns: If your producer application crashes and then restarts, it may attempt to resend emails to users who have already been queued.

Message Queue: Messages can pile up in RabbitMQ, with no acknowledgment mechanism to confirm which emails have already been sent.

Data Explosion: Tracking acknowledged messages in your database may not be scalable, especially with the sheer volume of notifications being sent.

Understanding Message Delivery Guarantees

In distributed systems using message queues, you typically face two types of message delivery semantics:

At-Most-Once Delivery: This means that a message is processed no more than one time but potentially not at all (even if the producer fails). This method effectively eliminates duplicates but can be risky since important messages may not be sent if the producer encounters an error.

At-Least-Once Delivery: This approach ensures that messages are delivered at least once, which can lead to duplicates if not managed carefully. It's more reliable but requires extra handling to avoid sending the same message multiple times.

Suggested Solution

To strike a balance between reliability and avoiding duplicates, consider implementing the following strategies:

Acknowledgment Mechanism

Producer to Consumer: Have the consumer acknowledge the receipt and processing of messages to the producer. This ensures that the producer knows which messages have been successfully handled.

State Management: The producer should maintain a record of messages that have not been acknowledged. This allows the producer to retry sending those messages if they are not confirmed.

Deduplication Process

Consumer Acknowledgment: The consumer receives a message and processes it, then acknowledges the message.

Acknowledgment State: The consumer maintains a record of acknowledged messages. If it receives a message that it has previously acknowledged, it simply ignores the request to process it again.

Database Considerations: Although this approach requires additional database writes (potentially three: to write an unacknowledged message, and to record the acknowledgments), it significantly reduces the chances of duplicates being sent.

Important Trade-offs

Be mindful of the database load and structure; track only necessary identifiers to avoid performance bottlenecks.

Design your architecture to scale as more users or content triggers are introduced, ensuring that performance does not degrade as volume increases.

Conclusion

Navigating the intricacies of message delivery in asynchronous systems like RabbitMQ is challenging, particularly when the need to avoid duplicate emails becomes a priority. By implementing acknowledgment mechanisms and managing state efficiently, you can mitigate the risk of duplicates without sacrificing the reliabili