Explore why the `onCharacteristicChanged` callback in Android BLE behaves differently in Wear OS devices like Suunto 7 compared to smartphones like Galaxy S9+ , and learn how to synchronize callback intervals across devices.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/67251407/ asked by the user 'user2993539' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2993539/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/67251671/ provided by the user 'Pooya Chavoshi' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9343558/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why Android BLE gatt callback method onCharacteristicChanged callback is called in lower rate in Wear OS device than on smartphone?
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding onCharacteristicChanged Callback Discrepancies in Wear OS and Smartphones
When developing applications that utilize Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) connections, understanding how the onCharacteristicChanged callback behaves can significantly affect data communication efficiency. This guide addresses a common concern among developers: why is the onCharacteristicChanged callback triggered at different rates on Wear OS devices compared to smartphones? We’ll specifically explore the reasons behind this delay, particularly when comparing devices like the Suunto 7 and the Galaxy S9+ .
The Problem
As a BLE GATT client on Wear OS, you may notice that notifications from your GATT server vary in frequency depending on the device. For instance, while testing your application on a Suunto 7, you might experience the onCharacteristicChanged callback firing every 50 milliseconds. In contrast, the same notification on a Galaxy S9+ could trigger every 5 milliseconds. This difference can create challenges when transferring large amounts of data between devices, particularly if you expect timely updates or notifications.
Why Does This Happen?
Hardware Limitations
One of the primary reasons for the disparity in callback rates is the hardware specifications of the devices involved:
Galaxy S9+ : This smartphone features a robust Bluetooth implementation, supporting 5.0, A2DP, LE, which allows for faster and more efficient data handling.
Suunto 7: As a smartwatch, the Suunto 7 is designed with more stringent hardware constraints and is likely optimized for power consumption, which can lead to a lower callback frequency.
Connection Priorities and MTU Size
While setting the MTU size to the maximum (517 bytes) and using a high connection priority (BluetoothGatt.CONNECTION_PRIORITY_HIGH) is beneficial, other factors come into play that might limit performance, especially on resource-constrained devices like Wear OS smartwatches.
Solutions to Improve Callback Frequency
If you want to synchronize the data transfer rates between your Wear OS device and smartphone, consider the following solution.
Introducing Delay for Galaxy S9+
A practical approach to achieving a more consistent callback interval across devices involves introducing a tweak in your code. By adding a 45ms delay specifically when the Galaxy S9+ is connected, you can balance the callback timings. Here’s how to implement it:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Explanation of the Code
Device Name Check: The code starts by checking if the connected device is the Galaxy S9+ .
Handler: It utilizes an Android Handler to introduce a delay of 45 milliseconds before running the associated processing function.
Else Clause: In case a different device is connected, it executes the data handling function immediately without delay.
By following this approach, you can manage differences in callback rates and ensure smoother data transmission between your Wear OS and smartphone devices.
Conclusion
In summary, differences in BLE callback behavior between Wear OS devices and smartphones can stem from hardware limitations and connection efficiency. By implementing a simple delay for specific devices, you can achieve more synchronized data transmission across platforms. This adjustment not only enhances user experience but also ensures that your applications run smoothly across varying hardware environments.
Feel free to experiment with these techniques in your own applications, and don't hesitate to reach out for further clarification or assistanc
Информация по комментариям в разработке