Скачать или смотреть Streamlining Your Go Code: Using Reflection and the DRY Principle

Simplify your Go functions by implementing `reflection` and the `DRY` principle. Learn how to reduce repetitive code in your projects effectively.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68652630/ asked by the user 'Jeremy Webb' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13859924/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68652812/ provided by the user 'Burak Serdar' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11923999/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Use of reflection and DRYing out some code

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Streamlining Your Go Code: Using Reflection and the DRY Principle

In the world of software development, being efficient and keeping your code clean is paramount. One common challenge programmers face is repetitiveness in code—especially when creating similar constructs for different types. If you’re a Go developer, you may have faced a situation where your function needs to handle various subtypes of an interface but ends up looking cluttered and repetitive.

In this guide, we will tackle a common scenario in Go programming: how to use reflection to simplify your code while adhering to the Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle.

The Problem

You have a function, AddProp, which takes a type of prop (an interface) and two integers, x and y. This function checks the type of prop it receives, creates a new instance of that type, and invokes its New method. As your function grows in size due to many cases for different types, it becomes cumbersome and redundant.

Here’s a simplified version of the code you might currently be using:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

As you can see, this function can get quite long with multiple cases for each sub-type. So, how can we simplify this?

The Solution

Fortunately, with Go’s reflect package, you can eliminate the need for the switch statement and create a much more streamlined function. All you need is the following approach:

Step 1: Use Reflection to Create New Instances

Instead of manually handling each type, we can utilize reflection to dynamically create new instances of any type that implements the New method.

Here’s how to implement this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Testing the Function

To see how this works, you can test the function with both Rock and Fence:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits

Reduced Complexity: By leveraging reflection, you avoid having to explicitly handle each type in a switch statement.

Maintainability: Your code is cleaner, and adding new subtypes is simplified as they will automatically be handled by this function.

Readability: Clear and concise code is always easier to read and understand for both current and future developers.

Conclusion

By using reflection in Go, you can significantly simplify functions that work with various subtypes of an interface. Not only does this adhere to the DRY principle, but it also enhances the overall maintainability and readability of your code. Don't hesitate to apply these techniques in your Go projects for cleaner and more efficient code!

Implementing these concepts will free you from the shackles of repetitive code and give you the confidence to write more elegant solutions.