Скачать или смотреть Understanding Why Multiprocessing Can Be Slower Than a Simple For Loop in Python

Discover the reasons behind the slower performance of `multiprocessing` compared to traditional `for loops` in Python. This blog explains overhead issues and when you should use multiprocessing for optimal performance.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62553049/ asked by the user 'Doggy Face' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12866337/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62553199/ provided by the user 'Bram Dekker' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13799357/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why multiprocessing is slower than simple for loop?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Why Multiprocessing Can Be Slower Than a Simple For Loop in Python

In the world of programming, performance is crucial, especially when dealing with large datasets or time-consuming tasks. Recently, a question was posed regarding the efficiency of multiprocessing compared to a simple for loop in Python. The findings indicated that multiprocessing was significantly slower than a straightforward loop. This guide will dive into the reasons behind this phenomenon, breaking it down in an understandable way.

The Experiment Setup

The initial experiment involved comparing two different approaches to executing a simple function in Python. Here’s a breakdown of the code used:

Normal For Loop

The first method utilized a normal for loop to run the spawn function where it prints two numbers:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Multiprocessing

The second method attempted the same operation using Python's multiprocessing module, launching new processes for each iteration:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Results of the Experiment

The execution times resulted in a surprising outcome:

Total Running Time simple for loop: 0.099 seconds

Total Running Time multiprocessing: 40.15 seconds

Clearly, the multiprocessing approach was far slower than the for loop, raising the question: Why?

Understanding the Overhead of Multiprocessing

What is Overhead?

In computing, overhead refers to the amount of time and resources required to manage and set up a process rather than actually executing the main tasks. In the case of Python's multiprocessing, several factors contribute to this overhead:

Process Creation: Each time a new Process is created, Python goes through a series of steps to allocate memory, initialize the process, and set up a communication channel.

Process Termination: Once the task is complete, processes also require time to terminate cleanly.

Interprocess Communication (IPC): Managing communication between processes can add additional latency.

Balancing Complexity and Performance

The key takeaway is that for simple operations like the spawn function, the overhead from managing multiple processes outweighs any benefits gained from parallel execution. However, for more complex tasks that require considerable processing power, multiprocessing may lead to significant performance boosts.

When to Use Multiprocessing

Multiprocessing can be particularly effective in scenarios involving:

Heavy computations: Complex algorithms or operations that consume considerable CPU time.

Independent tasks: Tasks that do not need to interact or share data frequently can benefit from parallel processing.

Conclusion

While multiprocessing offers a powerful capability for improving Python's performance in specific contexts, it is essential to be mindful of its overhead costs. In this experiment, using a simple for loop outperformed multiprocessing due to the overhead involved in process management.

Understanding the nature of your tasks and the potential overhead of your chosen method can help you make informed decisions on how to optimize your Python code for better performance.

With this knowledge, you are one step closer to writing efficient and effective Python programs that take full advantage of the capabilities of your machine.