Скачать или смотреть Do I Need to Delete a Pointer in the Plugin Class in Qt?

Discover whether to manually delete pointers in your Qt plugin class. Learn safe memory management practices to avoid memory leaks.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64676490/ asked by the user 'Chris' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9486670/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64676603/ provided by the user 'Adrian Maire' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/903651/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Do I need to delete point in plugin class in Qt?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Do I Need to Delete a Pointer in the Plugin Class in Qt?

In the world of C+ + programming and especially when working with the Qt framework, developers often grapple with memory management issues. One common question that arises is whether you need to manually delete pointers in a plugin class. In this post, we’ll explore this concept in depth and provide guidance on best practices for managing your memory when using Qt's QPluginLoader and related classes.

Understanding the Problem

When you instantiate objects in Qt, especially through plugins, ownership becomes a critical aspect of your code. Specifically, when working with pointers, you need to determine who is responsible for freeing that memory — will it be you, or will Qt handle it for you? In our scenario, we have a class that makes use of QPluginLoader, and the question revolves around the necessity of deleting a pointer (m_Core) derived from QObject. The initialization and cleanup sequence can lead to crashes if not handled correctly, so let’s dive into the proper approach here.

The Original Code Structure

Before we jump into solutions, let’s take a look at the relevant code snippets to understand the context better:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Dilemma

When the program terminates, if m_Core is deleted in the Mplugin destructor, the application can crash. If not deleted, there is a potential for a memory leak since the allocated memory for m_Core won’t be freed.

Evaluating the Solutions

1. The Principle of Ownership

The first step toward addressing the issue is understanding the principle of ownership. It's essential to determine who owns the pointer and is responsible for its lifecycle. If the plugin loader takes care of cleanup, you might not need to do it explicitly. However, the safest route usually means ensuring that you manage your pointers clearly to avoid leaks or crashes.

2. Using Stack Variables (Not the Best Practice)

A quick fix could involve using a stack-allocated instance of SF_Core.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This method is not best practice because exposing internal variables could lead to further issues, especially in complex classes and hierarchies.

3. Opt for Smart Pointers

An excellent alternative to raw pointers is to use smart pointers. Smart pointers like std::shared_ptr automatically manage memory and ensure that objects are deleted when no longer in use. Here’s how you might adapt your code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

4. Minimal Fix — Just Fix the Code

If you prefer to stick with raw pointers and ensure your original logic remains intact, you can slightly modify the destructor method to handle null pointers correctly:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

Navigating memory management in C+ + can be daunting, especially in a framework like Qt that introduces additional complexities like plugins. Whether you ultimately decide to manually manage pointers or embrace smart pointers to automate memory management, the key lies in understanding ownership principles clearly. This approach will safeguard against crashes or memory leaks, leading to robust and reliable applications.

Remember, consider the ownership of your pointers carefully whenever you are working with dynamic memory in Qt and C+ + . Adopting these good practices will help you create maintainable and error-free code!