Скачать или смотреть How to Mock ExecutorService in Unit Tests with Mockito

Learn how to effectively mock `ExecutorService` in your unit tests using Mockito to avoid errors and ensure reliable tests.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62933638/ asked by the user 'M06H' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2781389/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62936964/ provided by the user 'Nir Levy' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5091073/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: mocking Executorservice field in unit test

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Mock ExecutorService in Unit Tests with Mockito

Unit testing is a crucial part of software development, ensuring that our code behaves as expected. However, when working with complex components like the ExecutorService, we can encounter challenges. In this guide, we’ll address a common problem related to unit testing a service class that uses ExecutorService, and provide a clear solution.

The Problem: Mocking ExecutorService in Unit Tests

When you're testing a service class in Java that has dependencies on ExecutorService, such as in the provided AsyncProcessor class, you might face problems during instantiation or tests. Here's a brief overview of the service in question:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When attempting to create an instance of AsyncProcessor during your unit tests, you are likely to encounter errors related to executorService initialization.

The Solution: Refactoring the Code

To effectively mock the ExecutorService, we need to refactor our code. Instead of directly initializing the executorService within the constructor of your service, you can create it as a separate bean in your application context. This allows for easier injection and mocking during testing.

Step-by-step Refactoring

Create an ExecutorService Bean

In your application context, define a method to create the ExecutorService bean. Here’s how you can do it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Modify the Constructor of AsyncProcessor

Update the constructor of AsyncProcessor to accept ExecutorService as a dependency:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Adjust Your Unit Tests

Now that executorService can be easily injected, you can modify your unit test to mock it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of This Approach

Easier Testing: By injecting the ExecutorService, you can easily provide a mock implementation, leading to more isolated and reliable tests.

Separation of Concerns: Keeping the instantiation of the executor service as a separate bean promotes cleaner code architecture and easier maintenance.

Flexibility: This pattern allows you to easily switch out the executor service for different configurations without changing the service logic.

Conclusion

Mocking dependencies like ExecutorService in unit tests can initially seem daunting. However, by refactoring your code to use dependency injection, you can avoid common pitfalls and create maintainable, reliable tests. Implementing these changes not only streamlines your testing process but also enhances the overall design of your application.

With a well-structured approach, you can ensure that your tests run smoothly without conflicts, providing you with the confidence to keep your codebase robust and error-free.