Скачать или смотреть Why the Resistance?

The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis has faced repeated scrutiny and critique...which is appropriate for any significant scientific claim. But the intensity of opposition may stem from more than methodological concerns.

Established paradigms naturally resist change. When evidence challenges foundational assumptions, resistance often follows.

The hypothesis intersects with several long-standing debates:
Climate researchers focused on anthropogenic factors may find the demonstration of catastrophic cosmic-driven climate change complicates current frameworks.

Proponents of human overkill models for megafauna extinctions face evidence suggesting cosmic impact as a primary driver...requiring reconsideration of causation.

Archaeological models built on gradualist assumptions about cultural development must account for potential catastrophic disruption 12,800 years ago.

These aren't trivial concerns. Academic careers, research programs, and theoretical frameworks are legitimately invested in existing interpretations. Evidence that requires fundamental reassessment naturally generates substantial resistance.

The question is whether that resistance reflects scientific rigor or paradigm protection.

The CRG pursues evidence-based research regardless of its implications for established models.

Support independent inquiry. Link in bio.