Скачать или смотреть How to Properly Stop Coroutine Threads in Kotlin

Discover the best practices for managing coroutine threads in Kotlin, ensuring you can stop them effectively to prevent issues in your applications.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/71766385/ asked by the user 'Giorgi Odishvili' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15452635/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/71768173/ provided by the user 'Tenfour04' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/506796/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Thread underneath coroutineScope does not stop

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Coroutine Threads in Kotlin

If you've ever dabbled in Kotlin's coroutines, you might have encountered a perplexing issue: fully stopping the underlying thread that a coroutine uses. While coroutines provide a convenient way to handle asynchronous programming in Kotlin, they can sometimes leave you scratching your head when it comes to cleanup. In this post, we'll break down a common problem—why your coroutine threads might not be stopping as expected and how to effectively manage them.

The Problem

You may find yourself in a situation where you've initiated coroutines using a specific CoroutineScope and when you attempt to cancel that scope, the related thread moves to a WAITING state. This behavior can be counterintuitive, especially if you're aiming for a clean shutdown of all concurrent operations. As seen in a related case:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When invoking this line, you expect all associated threads to cease operation instantly. However, what often occurs is frustrating—the underlying thread simply awaits its next task instead of stopping entirely.

Why This Happens

It's important to understand that the CoroutineScope does not own the CoroutineDispatcher it's using. The dispatcher can actually be shared among multiple coroutine scopes and is merely a parameter passed during the creation of the scope. Therefore, canceling a CoroutineScope does not automatically close down its dispatcher, leaving threads hanging in a waiting state.

Key Points to Remember:

The CoroutineScope doesn't manage the lifecycle of the dispatcher.

Calling scope.cancel() only cancels the coroutines running within that scope, not the dispatcher itself.

Threads can remain in a WAITING state if they are being reused or are part of a shared dispatcher.

Solution: Properly Stopping Coroutine Threads

To effectively manage the lifecycle of your coroutine threads, it’s essential to take control of the CoroutineDispatcher as well. Follow these structured steps to ensure a smooth shutdown of your coroutine operations:

1. Store Your Dispatcher

Store your CoroutineDispatcher in a property that you can reference later when you want to perform cleanup. For example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Cancel Coroutines

When cancelling coroutines, you'll also need to ensure you are correctly removing jobs from your storage:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

3. Close the Dispatcher

After cancelling jobs within the scope, ensure you explicitly close the dispatcher:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By managing the lifecycle of the dispatcher directly, you can prevent threads from staying in a waiting state after cancellation, leading to a more efficient cleanup process.

Conclusion

Managing coroutine threads in Kotlin can present its challenges, particularly with regard to lifecycle management. Remember that the CoroutineScope and CoroutineDispatcher are distinct entities. By taking charge of both, you ensure that your application's threads are stopped correctly and avoid unnecessary waiting states. Through best practices like storing the dispatcher and appropriately handling cancellations, you can enhance the robustness of your concurrent applications.

By properly managing coroutine threads, you can not only prevent performance bottlenecks but also ensure your application runs smoothly and efficiently. Happy coding!