Скачать или смотреть How to Optimize PostgreSQL UPSERT Performance with Conflict Arbiter Indexes

Discover effective strategies to tackle `slow PostgreSQL UPSERT` operations when dealing with non-indexed columns. Improve your database performance today!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/76728663/ asked by the user 'Alechko' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4834383/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/76728988/ provided by the user 'Laurenz Albe' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6464308/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Slow PostgreSQL UPSERT with "Conflict Arbiter Indexes" on non indexed column

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Slow PostgreSQL UPSERT Operations

When working with PostgreSQL, data manipulation can sometimes lead to unexpected performance issues, especially during UPSERT operations. One common problem arises when attempting to insert or update rows in a table that has conflict arbiter indexes on non-indexed columns. This issue can cause significant slowdowns, bottlenecking your database operations and leading to frustrating delays.

In this guide, we will explore the challenge faced during a particular UPSERT query, dissect the underlying causes, and outline the most effective solutions to improve performance.

The Problem

Consider a scenario where you've written a query to UPSERT data into a table that has several indexes but lacks one on the updated column. Below is a simplified version of the query, which is meant to insert values into a counters table while updating existing rows when conflicts occur. Here's the essential part of the SQL:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Observations

The query executes slowly, taking up to 3566 ms on a small table with only 250 rows.

The performance issue is particularly prevalent when multiple updates occur concurrently on the same rows.

Factors considered include the presence of check constraints and the absence of indexes on the updated column.

Diagnosing the Bottleneck

The underlying cause of the slow performance is rooted in locking mechanisms within PostgreSQL. Here’s a breakdown of the factors contributing to the bottleneck:

Lock Contention: Given that multiple updates are trying to access and modify the same rows concurrently, it leads to increased wait times for locks.

Check Constraints: The presence of check constraints can further complicate updates, leading to more overhead during write operations.

Lack of Indexes: Without indexes on the columns being updated, PostgreSQL must perform full scans, causing slower update times.

To gain insights into how long locks are causing delays, enabling log_lock_waits could be beneficial, as it would log when any lock is waited on for longer than one second.

Solutions to Improve UPSERT Performance

Here are some strategies you can adopt to alleviate the performance issues faced during UPSERT operations:

1. Analyze and Optimize your Indexing

Add Indexes on Updated Columns: If certain columns are frequently updated, consider adding indexes on them. This can make lookups and updates faster, reducing the chance of lock contention.

2. Change the UPSERT Logic

Switch the Order of Operations: Rather than using an UPSERT directly, consider first attempting an update followed by an insert if no rows are affected. This can sometimes reduce the overhead associated with handling conflicts:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

3. Adjust Fillfactor

Modify Fillfactor: If the updates are not being recognized as hot updates (which are efficient), consider adjusting the table's fillfactor. A lower fillfactor reduces the number of tuples per page, making space for new tuples and potentially improving update performance.

4. Leverage Connection Pooling

Use Connection Pooling: Managing database connections efficiently can also mitigate locking issues by minimizing contention during high-load periods.

5. Monitor Database Performance

Utilize Monitoring Tools: Keep an eye on locks and query performance. Use PostgreSQL's built-in tools like pg_stat_all_tables to analyze how often tuples are updated and how many hot updates are executed.

Conclusion

Handling slow PostgreSQL UPSERT operations can seem daunting, particularly when issues like lock contention arise. By implementing effective strategies, such as indexing, re-evalu