Скачать или смотреть FIFTHYFIFTHY vs ATTRAKT - Update!

#attrakt #fiftyfifty #kpopnews

🔔 For more Kpop News subscribe to    / @keepupwithkpop  

The four members of FIFTY FIFTY have released an announcement through their legal consultant related to their one-of-a-kind contract.

On June 28, FIFTY FIFTY launched an authentic statement through their legal consultant regulation firm #BARUN mentioning that they filed for provisional disposition suspending the validity of their unique contracts, claiming that their company ATTRAKT violated contract terms. Below is the full declaration from FIFTY FIFTY’s legal consultant BARUN
This is an announcement from regulation association BARUN, the legal consultant of FIFTY FIFTY’s Saena, Keena, Aran, and Sio.

Through their legal representative, the 4 members filed an application for provisional disposition suspending the validity of their specific contracts to the Seoul Central District Court on June 19, and the trial is presently underway. This is due to the reality that ATTRAKT violated contract terms and took actions that destroyed a relationship primarily based on trust.

📺 Watch the entire video for more information!
_________________________________________________________________

About Keep Up With KPOP
🎥 Videos about Kpop, BlankPink and Baby Monster
🎨 Written, voiced and produced by Keep Up With KPOP
🔔 Subscribe now for more Kpop News and Dance videos

Watch More from Keep Up With KPOP
🟢    • BlackPink  
🟠    • Baby Monster  
🔴    • (G)I-dle  
_____________________________________________________

💼 Business Inquiries and Contact
• For business inquiries, copyright matters or other inquiries please contact us at: [email protected]

❓ Copyright Questions
• If you have any copyright questions or issues you can contact us at [email protected]

⚠️ Copyright Disclaimers
• We use images and content in accordance with the YouTube Fair Use copyright guidelines
• Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”
• This video could contain certain copyrighted video clips, pictures, or photographs that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.