Скачать или смотреть Microneedling vs RF Microneedling - What’s the difference, and which one is actually better for your

Microneedling vs RF Microneedling - What’s the difference, and which one is actually better for your skin?

There’s a lot of buzz around radiofrequency (RF) microneedling, but here’s why I’m still a bigger fan of traditional microneedling when it comes to skin health and ageing well.

While both treatments use tiny needles to create controlled micro-injuries and stimulate collagen, RF microneedling adds heat into the mix, delivering radiofrequency energy into the skin to create an inflammatory response.

And while inflammation does trigger collagen production, too much of it isn’t always a good thing - especially when it comes to ageing skin. Chronic inflammation can actually speed up collagen breakdown and lead to unnecessary stress on the skin’s repair systems.

On the other hand, classic microneedling is all about gentle, natural collagen stimulation. It encourages healthy fibroblast activity (the cells responsible for producing collagen and elastin) without creating excess inflammation. That means stronger, healthier skin over time - without the risk of overstimulation or unwanted fat loss.

So, if you’re looking to improve fine lines, texture, and overall skin quality in a way that works with your skin’s natural repair process, microneedling (without RF) is still one of my go-to treatments.

What do you think? Have you tried both? Let’s chat in the comments! 👇