Скачать или смотреть Solving the Tensor Size Tracing Issue in TorchScript

Discover how to effectively manage tensor size manipulations while tracing PyTorch models using TorchScript. Learn about combining scripting and tracing for better flexibility.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/67413808/ asked by the user 'Davide' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13732802/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/67415657/ provided by the user 'Szymon Maszke' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10886420/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Tracing Tensor Sizes in TorchScript

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Tracing Tensor Sizes in TorchScript: Solutions to Common Issues

When working with PyTorch and its TorchScript tracing feature, developers encounter a common challenge: managing tensor sizes while ensuring model compatibility. This issue arises particularly when trying to manipulate tensor shapes that are hardcoded as constants in TorchScript's internal compilation process. This guide explores this problem and provides effective solutions to maintain flexibility in your models while using tracing.

The Problem: Understanding Tensor Size Issues in Tracing

In TorchScript, when you attempt to trace a model, the tracing mechanism records the operations you perform on tensors. However, it does not dynamically adjust to tensor shapes that are dependent on the input's shape. Below is an example illustrating the problem:

Code Example

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When running the above code, the model works seamlessly with an input shape of (3, 5), but fails when the input size changes (to (3, 4)), demonstrating that the tensors' sizes are hardcoded during the trace, thus leading to incompatibility.

The Solution: Leveraging Scripting and Tracing

Although the tracing approach is meant to provide performance optimizations, there are moments when you may need the flexibility that scripting offers. Below, we discuss two effective strategies you can adopt:

1. Mixing Scripting and Tracing

You can seamlessly combine both torch.jit.script and torch.jit.trace in your model. Here’s how you can do that:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this implementation, the parts of the model that require shape adjustments can be scripted while other layers that can be traced are kept intact.

2. Isolating Size-Dependent Functionality

You can also isolate the size-dependent functionality in a separate function and use the @ torch.jit.script decorator for it. This strategy helps maintain clean separation and clarity in your model:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This separation allows the scripted portion of your model to handle shape-specific logic while keeping the rest of your code amenable to tracing.

Conclusion

While TorchScript's tracing feature is powerful, tensor size manipulations present a challenge that can break compatibility when inputs vary. By adopting these strategies — mixing scripting and tracing or isolating functionality requiring shape-dependent operations — you can enhance your model's flexibility without sacrificing performance. We hope this guide helps you troubleshoot and implement effective solutions for your Tensor size tracing issues in TorchScript.