Logo video2dn
  • Сохранить видео с ютуба
  • Категории
    • Музыка
    • Кино и Анимация
    • Автомобили
    • Животные
    • Спорт
    • Путешествия
    • Игры
    • Люди и Блоги
    • Юмор
    • Развлечения
    • Новости и Политика
    • Howto и Стиль
    • Diy своими руками
    • Образование
    • Наука и Технологии
    • Некоммерческие Организации
  • О сайте

Скачать или смотреть Understanding JavaScript Property Behavior: Why Override Getter with Field Works but Not Vice-Versa

  • vlogize
  • 2025-04-07
  • 0
Understanding JavaScript Property Behavior: Why Override Getter with Field Works but Not Vice-Versa
Override getter with field works but not vice-versa?javascript
  • ok logo

Скачать Understanding JavaScript Property Behavior: Why Override Getter with Field Works but Not Vice-Versa бесплатно в качестве 4к (2к / 1080p)

У нас вы можете скачать бесплатно Understanding JavaScript Property Behavior: Why Override Getter with Field Works but Not Vice-Versa или посмотреть видео с ютуба в максимальном доступном качестве.

Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Cкачать музыку Understanding JavaScript Property Behavior: Why Override Getter with Field Works but Not Vice-Versa бесплатно в формате MP3:

Если иконки загрузки не отобразились, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если у вас возникли трудности с загрузкой, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с нами по контактам, указанным в нижней части страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса video2dn.com

Описание к видео Understanding JavaScript Property Behavior: Why Override Getter with Field Works but Not Vice-Versa

Explore the reasons behind JavaScript's unique behavior when overriding fields and getters in class inheritance, and learn how to manage this with practical examples.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/77092766/ asked by the user 'Nexus' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3799957/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/77093264/ provided by the user 'Alexander Nenashev' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14098260/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Override getter with field works, but not vice-versa?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding JavaScript Property Behavior: Why Override Getter with Field Works but Not Vice-Versa

In the world of JavaScript, classes and inheritance can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior, particularly when it comes to property overriding. Developers may encounter a scenario where they can override a getter with either another getter or a field, but the reverse does not hold true – a field cannot be overridden by a getter. This article will delve into this distinct behavior to shed light on the mechanics behind it and provide practical solutions.

The Problem Explained

When working with classes in JavaScript, you might notice an intriguing pattern regarding how properties are defined and overridden. A common expectation might be that you should be able to freely swap fields for getters and vice-versa. However, that’s not the case!

The Class Structure

Consider the following class structure:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here, class A has a getter called foo and a field bar. Both are defined in the same class context.

Subclassing Woeful Expectations

When extending A in subclass B or C, you might think you could directly override these properties interchangeably, but that’s not how JavaScript works:

Subclass B:

foo can be made a field, and bar can be overridden by a getter.

Subclass C:

foo can only be overridden with another getter, but it can also maintain bar as a field.

Why This Behavior Occurs

The crux of the issue lies in how JavaScript manages properties:

Fields vs. Getters

Getters are defined on the prototype. This means they can be accessed through the prototype chain and can be overridden or modified more flexibly.

Fields (or regular properties), however, are established directly on instances of the class. When a property is found in the instance, JavaScript does not look in the prototype chain for an alternative of the same name.

Key Insight

If the property (field) exists in the object itself, JavaScript will ignore the prototype. This is why a field in an instance cannot be overridden by a getter defined in its class prototype.

How to Override Fields with Getters

To allow overriding a field with a prototype’s getter, you need to remove the field from the instance:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, the constructor of class B deletes the foo field defined in class A, thus allowing the getter in B to take effect effectively.

Conclusion

JavaScript’s property overriding behavior can initially seem surprising, especially for those new to the language's prototype system. However, by understanding the distinction between how fields and getters are defined and where they reside (instance vs. prototype), developers can navigate this quirk with confidence.

Feel free to explore constructing your classes and practices, keeping in mind these insights about getters and fields to craft more predictable and manageable JavaScript code!

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео

  • О нас
  • Контакты
  • Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer
  • Условия использования сайта - TOS
  • Политика конфиденциальности

video2dn Copyright © 2023 - 2025

Контакты для правообладателей [email protected]