Скачать или смотреть How to Convert an Image from OpenCV to Bytes: tostring() vs. io.BytesIO

Learn the differences between using `tostring()` and `io.BytesIO` for converting images from OpenCV to bytes, including practical examples and considerations.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63227096/ asked by the user 'JustinGong' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6618613/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63227662/ provided by the user 'Mark Setchell' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2836621/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Which way to use to convert an image read with cv2 to bytes? tostring() or io.BytesIO?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Image Conversion: tostring() vs. io.BytesIO in OpenCV

When working with images in Python using OpenCV, you may find yourself needing to convert an image into a byte array. This is particularly useful for transmitting images over the network or saving them for later use. However, two common methods to achieve this, tostring() and io.BytesIO, can be confusing. In this post, we will explore the differences between these methods and highlight the best practices for converting images to bytes.

The Problem Defined

You might have encountered a scenario where you read an image using OpenCV and needed to convert it into bytes. Consider the following code snippets:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

or

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here, the confusion arises from the output of A.tostring() which results in less memory usage compared to using io.BytesIO. But what do each of these methods actually do, and how do they differ in terms of output, structure, and usage? Let's break it down.

Understanding the Methods

Method 1: Using tostring()

When you use tostring() (or tobytes() in newer versions of NumPy), you receive a NumPy array containing raw pixel data. For example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Output: The variable im_bytes will be a byte string representing the raw pixel values of the image.

Structure: If the image is 1024x1024 pixels in RGB format, A will be a NumPy array of shape (1024, 1024, 3) and the byte string will contain 3MB of uncompressed pixel data without any metadata (dimensions, color depth, etc.).

Drawback: This method does not provide any context about the image such as its size or color space, which is essential for further processing or displaying.

Method 2: Using io.BytesIO

In this approach, you create a byte stream that holds a compressed JPEG version of the image using the Pillow library:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Output: The variable b now represents a JPEG-compressed version of the image stored in RAM.

Structure: The resulting byte stream contains not only the pixel data but also important information such as the version of JPEG format, image dimensions, and the required metadata for decompression.

Advantage: This method effectively preserves the context of the image for reliable usage down the line.

Additional Considerations

Avoid Redundancy

If you only want JPEG data, it’s more efficient to read it directly from the file instead of decoding and then re-encoding it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Sticking to OpenCV

If you do decide to decode and re-encode an image, it’s preferable to stick to OpenCV to avoid unnecessary dependencies on other libraries like Pillow:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Handling Color Formats

Keep in mind that OpenCV reads images in BGR format while other libraries like Pillow use RGB. If converting between these two formats, ensure to reorder the color channels to preserve color accuracy.

Conclusion

In summary, while both tostring() and io.BytesIO can convert images to bytes, they serve different purposes and have distinct outputs. Using io.BytesIO is generally the more informative approach as it encapsulates the image along with its metadata. Always choose the method that best fits your needs based on the context and requirements of your application.

By understanding these differences, you can choose the right method for your projects and avoid potential pitfalls in image processing. Happy coding!