Discover how to effectively measure function runtimes in Python, even when your functions involve waiting for user inputs. Learn strategies to bypass unexpected idle time in timing measurements.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/74151564/ asked by the user 'smyril' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15018486/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/74153824/ provided by the user 'gimix' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15844296/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Measuring Function runtime with waiting function
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Accurately Measure Function Runtime in Python with Waiting Functions
When working with functions in Python, especially those that require user interaction through pop-up windows, measuring the runtime can become challenging. For example, depending on how you measure the time, you may end up including time when the program is idle, waiting for user input. This can give you inaccurate metrics, making it crucial to learn how to measure run times correctly in such scenarios.
In this post, we’ll discuss a commonly used timing decorator that works perfectly in many cases but can fall short when your function waits for user input. We will also explore how to adjust your approach to achieve accurate timing for such functions.
The Challenge: Timing with Waiting Functions
Suppose you have a decorator that measures the runtime of a function, as shown in the code snippet below:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This decorator effectively captures the time taken for the function myfunc. However, if myfunc waits for user input (like closing a pop-up window), it will inaccurately measure the idle time when the window is open, including this time in the total calculation. Consequently, we do not get an accurate representation of the function's execution time.
The Solution: Redefining the Timing Measurement
To solve this problem, you can modify how you implement the timing function. Instead of timing the entire function that encompasses the user input wait, you can create an inner function that performs the actual work after the user has closed the window. Here's how you can structure your code:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Breaking It Down
Outer Function: Create an outer function where you will manage the user interaction. This function will handle the waiting period for user input as needed (e.g., for closing a pop-up window).
Inner Function with Timing: Inside the outer function, define an inner function decorated with your -timing decorator. This inner function will execute the actual processing or tasks you want to time.
Executing After User Input: Call the inner function only after the user input process (closing the popup) is completed. This approach ensures that only the relevant execution time is measured, leaving out any idle time.
Benefits of This Approach
Accurate Timing: By isolating the timing to just the functional execution, you avoid skewed results due to idle waiting time.
Enhanced Readability: Clearly defined inner and outer functions improve the clarity and organization of your code.
Reusable Structure: You can repurpose this structure for other functions that necessitate similar user interactions, ensuring consistency in how you measure runtimes.
Conclusion
Incorporating accurate timing measurements in Python functions, especially those that wait for user input, is crucial for performance assessments and optimizations. By encapsulating the workings of your function inside an inner function, you can gain precise runtime measurements that reflect only the execution time. Implementing this small change can lead to significantly more reliable metrics, enabling you to make better-informed decisions about your application's performance.
This approach not only addresses the specific problem of measuring runtimes during user interaction but also sets you up for success in any other potentially cumbersome timing situations you may face in Python development.
Информация по комментариям в разработке