Скачать или смотреть How to Effectively Mock HttpClient in .NET Core for Unit Testing

Discover how to efficiently mock the HttpClient's SendAsync method in .NET Core, ensuring seamless unit testing and better code architecture.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/69091529/ asked by the user 'user1765862' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1765862/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/69092506/ provided by the user 'Matt Thomas' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3063273/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: mock HttpClient SendAsync method

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Effectively Mock HttpClient in .NET Core for Unit Testing

When working with web applications, the HttpClient class is a fundamental component that developers often use to make HTTP calls to retrieve data. However, directly calling the SendAsync method of HttpClient can make unit testing your service logic cumbersome and unmanageable. In this guide, we’ll explore a streamlined approach to mocking the HttpClient's SendAsync method in .NET Core, ultimately enhancing your unit testing capabilities.

The Problem with Mocking HttpClient directly

In a typical usage scenario, you might have code that looks something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While this works well in production, testing modules that rely on actual HTTP calls can be inefficient and lead to flaky tests. Traditional mocking involves creating a mock of the HttpClient, but the real strength lies in encapsulating HTTP calls behind a custom interface.

A Better Approach: Encapsulation

Instead of mocking HttpClient calls directly, you can encapsulate HTTP functionalities within an interface. This method not only promotes better testing practices but also adheres to the Dependency Inversion Principle, one of the key concepts in SOLID principles.

Step 1: Define an Interface

Start by defining an interface that abstracts away your HTTP calls:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Implement the Interface

Next, create a class that implements this interface using HttpClient:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This adapter class allows you to separate concerns. Your application logic does not need to be aware of the underlying HTTP implementation, making it much easier to test.

Step 3: Adjust Your Service to Use the Interface

Transform your service to depend on the IClient interface instead of HttpClient. This way, during regular application operation, you can provide a real HttpClientAdapter, and during unit tests, it allows you to mock IClient seamlessly.

For example, your service could look like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 4: Mocking the Interface for Testing

Now you’re set up to easily mock IClient in your unit tests. With a library like Moq, mocking your interface looks straightforward:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You can then inject this mock into your service. This approach reduces the complexity in your tests, allowing you to focus on the logic rather than the details of HTTP communication.

Final Thoughts

By encapsulating your HTTP client interactions through an interface, you not only reduce the burden of unit testing but also create a cleaner, more maintainable codebase. This design lays the groundwork for more flexible and adaptable code while adhering to better software development principles. Remember, once your code depends on a small interface, mocking that interface during tests becomes simple and effective, ensuring that your application is robust and well-tested.

By following the guidelines discussed in this guide, you should find unit testing your .NET applications becomes more straightforward and effective, paving the way for better software architecture in your projects.