Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Const Qualifier with Pointers and References in C+ +

Explore the nuances of the `const` qualifier in C+ + when dealing with pointers and references. Discover why placing `const` on the left side of an ampersand is valid, while placing it on the right is not.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62414954/ asked by the user 'Reean' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11424379/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62415249/ provided by the user 'eerorika' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2079303/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why does putting const on the left side of an ampersand valid when referring to a pointer but not on the right?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the const Qualifier with Pointers and References in C+ +

Introduction

As C+ + developers, we often encounter various data types and qualifiers that can significantly affect how our code behaves. One area that can be particularly confusing is the use of the const qualifier when working with pointers and references. A common question is: Why is this line considered valid Entity* const & e = this;, while this one is not: Entity* & const e = this;?

In this guide, we will delve into the mechanics of how C+ + interprets const in conjunction with pointers and references, and clarify the rules that govern their usage.

The Role of Ampersand in C+ +

Before we jump into the specifics of the const qualifier, it's crucial to understand the role of the ampersand (&) in C+ + . The ampersand acts as a punctuator that designates a reference type, similar to how an asterisk (*) is used for pointers. In essence, when you see Entity* &, it indicates that you are working with a reference to a pointer of type Entity.

References vs. Pointers

To solidify this concept:

Pointers store the address of variables. For instance, Entity* ptr can point to an instance of Entity.

References act as aliases for existing variables. For example, Entity& ref is a reference to an existing Entity instance.

Understanding const Placement

Valid Usage: Entity* const & e = this;

In the line above, we have:

Entity* denotes a pointer to an Entity object.

const is placed before the ampersand, indicating that e is a reference to a pointer that cannot change to point to a different Entity. This means you can still modify the pointed-to object, but you can't change where the pointer is directed.

In simpler terms:

You can change the value held in the Entity object that e points to, but you cannot change what e points to.

Invalid Usage: Entity* & const e = this;

Now, let's look at why this line results in an error:

The const is placed after the ampersand, which implies that it would apply to the reference itself. However, C+ + does not allow for a const reference.

References in C+ + are inherently constant after initialization; they cannot be reseated to refer to another object. Therefore, declaring a reference as const is not only redundant but also invalid.

What We Can Conclude About const and References

C+ + handles const qualifiers and references with specific rules. Here are the key takeaways:

const before &: Indicates that the reference to the pointer cannot change. This is valid and used in practice.

const after &: Suggests that the reference itself cannot change, which is not permissible in C+ + . In programming terms, a reference is like a constant that always refers to the same object.

Conclusion

Understanding how const interacts with pointers and references is crucial for writing efficient and error-free C+ + code. By placing the const qualifier correctly, you can control the mutability of pointers and ensure your code behaves as expected. Remember:

Use const on the left side of the ampersand for pointers to prevent the pointer from changing.

Recognize that references cannot be const since they are inherently unchangeable after they are set.

By keeping these principles in mind, you can navigate the complexities of C+ + with greater confidence and clarity.