Скачать или смотреть Understanding Why the Second Javascript Function Returns NaN

Discover why your second Javascript function produces NaN and learn how to fix it with simple explanations and examples.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63635801/ asked by the user 'Deepak Soni' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14020110/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63636753/ provided by the user 'subhadip pahari' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9756636/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why the Second Javascript Function returns NaN?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Why Does the Second Javascript Function Return NaN?

Javascript can be a tricky language to master, especially when it comes to understanding functions and their return values. If you've ever encountered a situation where a function returns NaN (Not a Number), you might find yourself scratching your head in confusion. In this guide, we’ll examine a specific example that trips many developers up and clarify why it happens. Let’s dive in!

The Issue Explained

Consider two functions that are supposed to calculate the factorial of a number. The first function works perfectly, while the second one ends up returning NaN. Here’s a look at both functions:

The First Function: Correct Implementation

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This function correctly calculates the factorial of 4, which is 24 (4 * 3 * 2 * 1). It uses a recursive approach and stops when n is less than or equal to 1.

The Second Function: Problematic Implementation

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this version, the intention was to return a string when n is 1 or lower. However, this leads to a NaN output when the function is run.

Why Does the Second Function Return NaN?

The crux of the issue lies in the string returned by the second function when recursion stops. Let’s break it down step by step:

1. Understanding Template Literals

In the second function, the line Factorial is : ${n} uses template literals (enclosed by backticks). Template literals allow the inclusion of variables inside a string.

However, the main problem is what happens during the multiplication operation.

2. Returning a String Instead of a Number

When n reaches 1, the function returns a string: Factorial is : 1.

This translates into the overall expression return n > 1 ? n * fact(n - 1) : 'Factorial is : 1';.

Now, for n * fact(n - 1), fact(n - 1) has produced a string that is non-numeric.

3. The Arithmetic Operation: Number vs. String

When you attempt to multiply a number (n) by a string ('Factorial is : 1'), Javascript can't perform the operation. The multiplication of a number and a non-numeric string will always result in NaN.

Hence, the function ultimately produces NaN.

How to Fix It

To resolve the issue, simply ensure that you return a numeric value when your factorial function reaches its base case. Here’s a corrected version of the second function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By returning 1 instead of a string, the function now correctly computes the factorial for any non-negative integer.

Conclusion

Understanding how different data types interact in Javascript is crucial to avoiding common pitfalls like returning NaN. In our example, the mix of a numeric operation and a string caused confusion leading to an error in calculation. By ensuring consistent data types in your return values, you can build more robust and error-free functions. Happy coding!