Скачать или смотреть How to Use queueinglib with cPacket Instead of cMessage in OMNeT++

Discover how to effectively work with `queueinglib` in OMNeT++ when you need to use `cPacket`. This guide provides practical solutions for incorporating custom message types into your simulation model.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/71995013/ asked by the user 'İpek' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8574329/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72422043/ provided by the user 'Rudi' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/709234/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How can use queueinglib with cPacket instead of cMessage?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Navigating Message Types in OMNeT++: A Guide to Using queueinglib with cPacket

When working with simulation models in OMNeT++, developers often encounter the challenge of choosing the right type of message for their specific requirements. A common question arises when using the queueinglib: How can I utilize queueinglib with cPacket instead of cMessage?

Understanding the Problem

Many users of older versions of queueinglib might remember that the Job class was designed to inherit from cPacket. However, with recent updates, Job now inherits from cMessage, which poses a challenge. This shift is crucial for users needing to support both internal messages (which can comfortably use cMessage) and external ones (which ideally should use cPacket).

Key Points of the Issue:

Current Structure: Job now inherits from cMessage, complicating its use within systems that rely on cPacket.

External Messaging Needs: Some models require external messages to be packet-based for seamless data transmission.

Library Extensibility: Users may feel constrained by the library's lack of extensibility, limiting customization.

Exploring Solutions

Modify the Existing queueinglib

The most straightforward and effective solution is to modify the Job.msg files directly in the queueinglib:

Change Job Definition: Open Job.msg and change the line:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

to:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Utilize Job for Custom Messages: By making Job the base for your custom packet types, you can seamlessly integrate it with your external messages.

Using an Alternate Approach Without Modification

If modifying the queuing library isn't preferable, consider using fields in cMessage to store references or pointers:

Pointer Management:

You can utilize setContextPointer() or setControlInfo() methods to save a reference to your cPacket.

Ensure these pointers are set upon entering the queueing system and cleared upon exiting.

This method, while requiring more effort, keeps messages cleaner and separate from queuing-specific data, maintaining a solid design framework.

Considering External Libraries

If you find that the existing queueinglib isn't flexible enough for your needs, explore external queuing libraries, such as the one located in the inet's src/inet/queueing directory. They might provide better adherence to modern practices and more extensibility for your project requirements.

Conclusion

In summary, when faced with the challenge of using queueinglib with cPacket, the recommended approach is to directly modify the Job definition to inherit from cPacket. This solution provides the simplest path forward for ensuring that both internal and external messages can properly coexist in your simulation model. As always, ensuring you document your changes will be vital for future upgrades.

By following these strategies, you can effectively overcome integration hurdles and bolster the functionality of your simulation environment. Happy simulating!