Скачать или смотреть IVIM: J4EIM Case Analysis – Part 3 (2025-12-18)

Episode #3:  Their 'Solution' – How EI Processes were Engineered to Mass-Deny Claims  (2025-12-18)

Presentation:  https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com/asse...


00:00 – Brief Review:  Summary of Previous Sections  (EI Claims Process, EI Act & BE-Memo)

J4EIM Home Page:  https://Justice4EIMisconduct.com 

Court Files & Presentations:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...

Press Releases:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...

Podcast:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...

YT Channel:     / @justice4eimisconduct  


02:13 – Changing Facts:  How the EI Commission Avoided Losing Appeals at the Tribunal  (SST)

The CEIC Changed Facts in Their Case, Claiming Their Own Prior Decisions were 'Clerical Errors'.

Big Idea:  Changing Facts is Potentially a Sanctionable Offence in Legal Proceedings. 

J4EIM Podcast:  Chapter 9:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...
YT:     • Chapter 09:  Falsified ROEs & Criminal Cod...  


06:34 – Atrium Decision Templates (Part #1):  The Tribunal's Internal Case Management Tools Use Pre-Written Decisions

An Overview of Atrium Decision Templates:  Their History, Current Requirements & Problems They Cause Adjudicators.

Big Idea:  EI Decisions are based on blocks of Prewritten Reasons, Case Citations & Footnotes that Direct the Outcome.  

Decision Templates:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...

J4EIM Podcast:  Chapter 3:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...
YT:     • Chapter 03:  Tribunal & Templates  


12:30 – Abuse of Process:  Misusing Historical EI Cases to Override the EI Act §29(c).

A Look at How Past EI Decisions were [Mis]Cited to Justify Not Conducting Just Cause 'Contrary to Law' Analysis.

Big Idea:  Abuse of Process is Potentially a Sanctionable Offence in Legal Proceedings.

Abuse of Process:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...

J4EIM Podcast:  Chapter 5:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...
YT:     • Chapter 05:  Abusing Case Law  


17:20 – Logical Fallacies:  How the 'Misconduct Test' was Modified to Override the EI Act §29(c).

Examining how the '4-Part Misconduct' was Changed with Two Logical Fallacies to Avoid 'Contrary to Law' Analysis

Big Idea:  Our Supreme Court Holds that 'Logical Fallacies' are Unreasonable.  (Vavilov ¶104) 

Internal Logic:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...

J4EIM Podcast:  Chapter 6:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...
YT:     • Chapter 06:  Erroneous 'Misconduct Test'  


25:40 – Atrium Decision Templates (Part #2):  How Templates are Used to 'Reverse-Engineer' EI Benefits Decisions

A Practical Examination of Contradictory Atrium Templates Citing the Case KVP.  (re. Unilaterally Imposed Policies)

Big Idea:  Our Supreme Court Holds that 'Reverse-Engineering Outcomes' is Unreasonable.  (Vavilov ¶121) 

Decision Templates:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...

J4EIM Podcast:  Chapter 3:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...
YT:     • Chapter 03:  Tribunal & Templates  


33:24 – 'TaxPayer' Error:  160+ EI Denials Based on Judges' Misunderstanding About How the EI Program is Funded 

A Brief Mention of Federal Decisions Denying EI Because the 'TaxPayers Should Not Fund Employer LawBreaking'.

Big Idea:  'Obiter Dicta' from Erroneous Case Law About EI Funding is being Cited as Precedent to Deny Benefits.


35:27 – Closing Thoughts (Next Steps):  Public Interest Letters, Public Interviews & Parliamentary Petition

A Quick List of Easy Actions we can Take to Fix this Injustice for All Canadians.  (Contact Courts & Ministers)

Big Idea:  We Can Cause Change by Sharing Our Concerns about this Major EI Scandal with our Leaders

Press Releases (PR):  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...

Public Interest Letters:  https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com...