Скачать или смотреть Mastering TestNg Grouping: Customizing Annotations for Advanced Testing

Learn how to customize `TestNg` grouping to implement an AND condition when running your tests. This guide will walk you through creating a custom `IMethodInterceptor` for effective test execution.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68459379/ asked by the user 'MarioBros' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12206112/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68465175/ provided by the user 'Gautham M' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7804477/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: TestNg grouping

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Mastering TestNg Grouping: Customizing Annotations for Advanced Testing

When working with the TestNg testing framework, the ability to group tests can greatly enhance your testing strategy. However, there are scenarios where you might need more control over how groups interact with each other, specifically when you want to execute tests based on an AND condition rather than the default OR condition. In this blog, we will explore how to achieve this customization effectively.

Understanding the Problem

In TestNg, the @ groups annotation allows you to categorize your test methods and run them based on groups defined in your test suite. For example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With the above setup, if you specify the groups as {group1, group2}, both test1 and test2 are triggered because the grouping logic evaluates them in an OR fashion—if any part of the group matches, the test runs. However, you may need a stricter condition where only tests that belong to all specified groups (AND condition) should execute. That is, in the aforementioned scenario, only test1 should run since it belongs to both group1 and group2.

The Solution: Creating a Custom IMethodInterceptor

While TestNg does not provide a straightforward way to switch from OR to AND in grouping, you can implement this behavior using a custom IMethodInterceptor. Below are detailed steps and the code required to achieve this.

Step 1: Implementing the Custom Interceptor

Create a new class that implements the IMethodInterceptor interface. This interface allows you to modify the list of test methods that should be executed based on your custom logic.

Here’s how you can implement it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Linking the Interceptor to Your Test Class

Once your interceptor is ready, the next step is to connect it to your test class using the @ Listeners annotation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Important Note on Group Exclusions

While mentioning group3 as an excluded group can work for specific scenarios, it won’t be a reliable solution for more complex grouping needs. The custom interceptor provides a scalable approach to ensure all defined groups are matched, reinforcing a strict AND condition.

Conclusion

Customizing groups in TestNg to require an AND condition can enhance how tests are selected for execution, leading to more precise testing scenarios. By implementing a custom IMethodInterceptor, you can gain complete control over which tests to run based on specific group conditions. This approach not only improves the accuracy of your testing strategy but also helps maintain the integrity of your testing environment.

Now that you know how to customize TestNg grouping, go ahead and implement this solution in your testing framework to make your tests even more robust!