Explore the significant differences between using the `select()` function and manually checking file descriptors in a loop. Learn how both methods affect performance and efficiency in Linux programming.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63117477/ asked by the user 'Gomo' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9171784/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63118297/ provided by the user 'secret squirrel' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5639126/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: difference between using select() and checking in a loop
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
The Difference Between Using select() and Checking in a Loop
When developing applications in Linux, particularly those that involve handling multiple input/output operations, you may find yourself at a crossroads: should you use the select() function or implement your own looping mechanism to monitor file descriptors? This guide will explore this fundamental question to help you make informed choices in your programming endeavors.
The Basics of select()
The select() function is part of the POSIX standard and is widely used in sockets and file descriptor management in Linux systems. Essentially, it allows your program to monitor multiple file descriptors to see if they are ready for reading, writing, or if an error occurred. Here are some key points about select():
Blocking Behavior: select() can block the process until one or more file descriptors are ready, which can help save CPU cycles.
Timeout Options: You can configure select() with a timeout period, allowing the process to wait for a specific amount of time before it times out.
Efficiency: By leveraging select(), the operating system can efficiently manage multiple connections without constantly polling each file descriptor.
Manual Looping: The Other Side of the Coin
On the other hand, a manual loop approach involves continuously checking each file descriptor to see if it’s ready to be read or written. While this might seem straightforward, it comes with significant drawbacks:
CPU Usage: A simple loop that polls file descriptors may lead to high CPU usage since it continuously checks the state of each file descriptor, even if nothing is happening.
Complexity: Implementing your own mechanism for handling timeouts or breaks adds to the code complexity, which can lead to more bugs and maintenance challenges.
Limited scalability: Managing a large number of file descriptors through manual looping can quickly become unwieldy and slow.
The Performance Advantage of select()
You might be wondering: why not just use a loop since it seems simpler? Here’s how select() shows a performance advantage over manual looping:
Resource Utilization: With select(), your application can go into a sleep mode while waiting for events, significantly reducing unnecessary CPU load.
Higher Concurrency: When dealing with multiple file descriptors, select() is capable of handling many connections efficiently, making it ideal for web servers and similar applications.
Built-in Mechanisms: select() includes built-in blocking and timeout capabilities that would otherwise require additional code logic if you were to implement a loop.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while both select() and manual looping can serve the purpose of monitoring file descriptors, the select() function offers superior efficiency and performance. By allowing your program to block until an event occurs, it minimizes CPU usage and simplifies code management. For applications that handle numerous file descriptors, using select() or its more modern counterpart, epoll(), can make a significant difference in performance and resource management.
So, the next time you’re faced with this choice in Linux programming, remember the efficiency and benefits that select() brings to the table!
Информация по комментариям в разработке