Скачать или смотреть Solving the C# Generic Method Abstraction Problem: A Pragmatic Approach

Discover a clear, practical solution for improving abstraction in C# generic methods, perfect for developers tackling database interaction issues.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63677512/ asked by the user 'iamblackornot' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12968751/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63677763/ provided by the user 'Kilanash' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/223942/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Cant make an appropriate abstraction when dealing with generic method (C# )

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving the C# Generic Method Abstraction Problem: A Pragmatic Approach

In the world of programming, especially with C# , developers often encounter difficulties when trying to abstract their code effectively. A common issue arises when dealing with generic methods that require specific but flexible return types. This guide delves into a specific case where a developer struggles to implement proper abstraction in a generic method designed for querying a SQLite database.

The Problem

A developer is attempting to create a wrapper around System.Data.SQLite features to reduce code duplication using object-oriented programming principles. The generic method in question is designed to execute a SQL select query and return a processed result based on a specified type parameter T, which should implement an interface called IDBResult.

Here's a simplified version of the implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Dilemma

The core issue arises in the catch block of the method, where the developer needs to return an instance of T upon encountering an error without being able to directly instantiate a type derived from CustomDBResult. There are a couple of proposed workarounds:

Change the return type to IDBResult: This would allow the method to return a generic error object. However, it means that the result would need to be cast back to T, which isn't ideal from a design standpoint.

Lift the try/catch block: This suggests wrapping the method call within an external error handling structure, leading to potential code duplication each time the method is used.

The Solution

After reviewing the problem and context, it is advisable to reconsider the existing abstractions as they may add unnecessary complexity. Here’s a more streamlined approach:

1. Eliminate IDBResult

The IDBResult interface, along with the abstract classes, may not serve a significant purpose and can complicate the design. Instead, consider using a single generic class for handling results that includes the required properties:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Modify Return Types

Combine both success and error handling into the same class:

You’ll still get the benefits of type safety with generics while simplifying error reporting.

This would allow the catch block to return an instance of CustomDBResult<T> directly, ensuring no casting is necessary.

Revised SendSelectQuery Method:

Here’s how the method could look with the suggested changes:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

The initial approach had a promising foundation but veered into unnecessary complexity with abstract classes and interfaces. Simplifying the design not only clarifies the behavior of your methods but also reduces the cognitive load for any developer who interacts with your code. If your goal is to create maintainable and understandable code, it’s always wise to revisit and refine abstractions to fulfill their purpose without overengineering.

In a landscape rich with libraries and tools, don't hesitate to leverage existing solutions to avoid reinventing the wheel!