Скачать или смотреть Solving the Pure Virtual Function Issue in C+ + with Polymorphism

Learn how to effectively resolve the `pure virtual function` issues in C+ + when working with derived classes and method overloading in your object-oriented programming.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63565855/ asked by the user 'Daniel' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12458717/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63567414/ provided by the user 'alex_noname' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13782669/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Pure virtual function issue

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving the Pure Virtual Function Issue in C+ + with Polymorphism

When you're diving into the world of C+ + and object-oriented programming, implementing polymorphism often leads to questions about pure virtual functions. One common issue arises when trying to override a pure virtual function in a derived class while wanting to give it a different signature. In this guide, we'll explore the root of the problem and present a structured solution.

Understanding the Problem

The issue at hand is centered around the following key points:

You have a base class that defines a pure virtual function.

The derived class needs to implement this function but with a different number of parameters.

An attempt to compile this results in an error indicating you cannot instantiate an abstract class.

Example Scenario

For instance, consider the following simplified structure of your sorting algorithms:

Base Class: SortingAlgorithms with a pure virtual function Sort().

Derived Class: MergeSort which needs to implement sorting but with its own set of parameters for a more complex sorting method.

Here's what that structure looks like in code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The issue arises because the overridden method in the derived class MergeSort cannot have a different parameter set than that defined in the base class.

Exploring the Solution

Keep Consistent Signatures

To resolve this issue effectively, we need to stick to a consistent method signature while also providing additional functionality if needed. The recommended approach is as follows:

Create an Entry Point: Use the pure virtual function in your base class as an entry point.

Internal Method: From the overridden function in the derived class, call a private method that takes the additional parameters.

Implementing the Solution

Here's an example to illustrate this concept:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of This Approach

Consistency: All derived classes maintain the same method signature.

Flexibility: You can still implement complex functionality by calling specialized private methods.

Scalability: This pattern can easily adapt as you add new sorting algorithms or functionalities.

Conclusion

Handling pure virtual function issues in C+ + can be tricky at first, especially when it comes to method signatures. By creating a structured solution that utilizes consistent method signatures while allowing for inner functionalities through private methods, you can successfully implement polymorphism without hitting compilation errors.

Remember, the key takeaway is to stick to the signature defined in your base class for overridden methods and then manage complexity within the derived classes. Happy coding!