Скачать или смотреть Handling Procedures that Accept NULL Parameters in SQL Server

Discover how to effectively manage `NULL` parameters in SQL Server stored procedures without sacrificing performance.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63056112/ asked by the user 'RegularNormalDayGuy' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7127929/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63056273/ provided by the user 'granadaCoder' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/214977/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Handle procedure that can take a null parameter

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Handling Procedures that Accept NULL Parameters in SQL Server

When working with hierarchical data in SQL Server, you may encounter situations where you need to handle stored procedures that accept NULL parameters. This can be particularly challenging if one of the parameters is optional and can be NULL. In this guide, we'll explore a practical approach to solve this problem effectively.

The Problem

Let’s consider a scenario where you have a hierarchical table, structured as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this table:

fkIDType cannot be NULL.

fkID can be NULL, meaning we might want to affect all rows of a certain fkIDType.

Suppose you have a stored procedure that needs to perform updates based on these parameters. The challenge arises when fkID is NULL, and you want to update all rows corresponding to that fkIDType.

Here’s an initial attempt at a solution:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While this works, it's not the most efficient way of handling it. Let's look at how we can simplify this query.

A More Efficient Solution

To streamline the process without affecting performance, we can use a CASE statement within the query. Here’s an updated version of your procedure:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Query

CASE Statement: It checks if @ fkID is NULL. If it is, it allows matching against the existing fkID in the table. This means that when you want to update all matching rows for a fkIDType (where @ fkID is NULL), the comparison will naturally succeed.

Performance Consideration: Although using such tricks can be effective, it's important to note that they can potentially impact performance on large datasets. Monitor and profile your queries accordingly.

Full Example

Here's a complete example demonstrating this updated logic with a table named Toy:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Results

This approach allows you to update specific records or all records tied to a specific type based on the provided parameters without complex conditional logic.

Conclusion

In this guide, we discussed how to handle NULL parameters in stored procedures effectively. By leveraging a conditional CASE statement, you can simplify your queries and enhance performance. Always remember to consider the impact of your solution on performance, especially when dealing with large datasets.

Feel free to experiment with these techniques in your SQL Server environment, and share your thoughts or any questions in the comments below!