Discover the nuances of Python's `ThreadPoolExecutor` and learn why its work queue can accept more tasks than the defined number of workers. Explore effective strategies to manage task submissions efficiently.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68751929/ asked by the user 'onesiumus' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11806934/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68752016/ provided by the user 'Jeremy Friesner' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/131930/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why does python's ThreadPoolExecutor work queue appear to accept more items than its maximum workers?
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Why Python's ThreadPoolExecutor Queue Accepts More Jobs Than Maximum Workers
When working with multithreaded applications in Python, the ThreadPoolExecutor is an incredibly useful tool for executing tasks concurrently. However, you might notice a peculiar behavior where it seems that the queue accepts more tasks than the number of maximum workers you have defined. This can lead to confusion, especially when you expect the number of tasks in the queue to match the number of workers available. Let's dive into this phenomenon and clarify what's really happening under the hood.
The Issue at Hand
Consider the following scenario: you initialize a ThreadPoolExecutor with a maximum of 5 workers. You may expect that when you submit a task, if all 5 workers are busy, the task should queue up. However, in some cases, you might find that the total number of tasks processed exceeds 5. This can lead to an alarming impression that your application is malfunctioning or that tasks are being executed improperly.
In the provided example, a function named make_request() checks the queue size using self.executor._work_queue.qsize() and decides to submit new tasks based on that number. It's expected to print 'HTTP_429' if the queue is full, but instead, you'll see multiple 'HTTP_202' responses before hitting the limit.
Why Does This Happen?
Understanding the Behavior of ThreadPoolExecutor
The behavior you are noticing stems from how ThreadPoolExecutor manages its tasks:
Idle Threads: The ThreadPoolExecutor maintains a pool of threads which can execute tasks concurrently. When a task request is made using submit(), if there is an idle thread available, the task does not need to wait in the queue. Instead, it is immediately assigned to that idle thread.
Immediate Execution: As a result, for the initial requests when all threads in the pool are not yet engaged, tasks are handed over to threads directly, circumventing the queue. This is why you will see fewer tasks in the queue than expected for the first few submissions.
Demonstrating the Behavior
To visualize this behavior, you can add a debug statement in your make_request() method, such as:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
By adding this line, every time you call make_request(), you will see that the queue size (qSize) remains 0 for the first several calls as the threads are immediately processing the tasks.
How to Control Task Submission Effectively
To manage your task submissions in line with the maximum number of workers, consider the following strategies:
Use a Semaphore: Implementing a semaphore can help control the number of concurrent submissions. A semaphore limits the number of tasks that can be submitted at the same time.
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Refactor Logic: You could also check the number of active tasks before submitting a new request. Another approach is to batch the requests based on the maximum worker limit.
Monitor Queue Length: Continuously monitor and adapt your logic based on the workload in the queue.
Conclusion
Understanding how Python's ThreadPoolExecutor works is crucial for optimizing your multithreaded applications. The key takeaway is that while it may seem that the work queue is able to accept more tasks than the maximum number of workers defined, it’s simply a matter of how tasks are being processed and assigned to available threads. With better comprehension of thread behavior and some modifications to your submission logic, you can effectively manage your task executions and avoid potential miscommunications or errors in your
Информация по комментариям в разработке