jug jug jiyo hd movie in hindhi 720p varun dawan kiara advani

Описание к видео jug jug jiyo hd movie in hindhi 720p varun dawan kiara advani

#bollywoodmovies










Copyright Alliance

Join Now

Login

Search

Search for:



blogs

blogs

press releases

media center

trending topics

event calendar

October 27, 2020

Education

Horror Movie Copyright Cases

by Samantha Levin



Photo Credit: iStock/photoguns

Updated: October 26, 2021

While Halloween brings to mind jack-o’-lanterns and spooky scary skeletons, some major horror movie franchises have had their spines tingle from the terrors of copyright infringement. From Friday the 13th to The Stuff, several horror films have caused courts to wrestle with difficult copyright issues. We bring you some standout horror movie copyright cases and their interesting implications to the law.

Effects Associates, Inc. v. Cohen (1990) – Right to Use a Copyrighted Work

Effects Associates, a special effects company, sued Cohen, a moviemaker, for copyright infringement when he used their footage without providing proper compensation or receiving a written license or assignment of copyright. The 9th Circuit analyzed whether a transfer of copyright without a written agreement, which is apparently not uncommon in the motion picture industry, followed the Copyright Act’s requirements.

Cohen created a satirical horror movie titled The Stuff. Primarily, Effects Associates created the dramatic end scene where the Stuff factory, which manufactured an alien life form that looked and tasted like frozen yogurt, explodes. The two parties made an oral agreement for production of the special effects shoots, but they did not discuss copyright ownership.

Cohen was dissatisfied with the scene and only paid Effects Associates half of his promised amount. Yet, Cohen still used the footage in his movie, which was distributed through New World Entertainment. Effects Associates claimed that Cohen did not have the rights to use this footage unless he paid the full contract price.

Regarding whether the copyright had been transferred to Cohen, the court explained how the Copyright Act requires copyright transfers to be made in writing. There is no exception for moviemakers who, according to Cohen, “do lunch, not contracts.”

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке