Logo video2dn
  • Сохранить видео с ютуба
  • Категории
    • Музыка
    • Кино и Анимация
    • Автомобили
    • Животные
    • Спорт
    • Путешествия
    • Игры
    • Люди и Блоги
    • Юмор
    • Развлечения
    • Новости и Политика
    • Howto и Стиль
    • Diy своими руками
    • Образование
    • Наука и Технологии
    • Некоммерческие Организации
  • О сайте

Скачать или смотреть Supreme Court REFUSES to Hear Case on Secret Recording of Attorney-Client Calls 😳

  • Mark Nicholson Law
  • 2025-10-16
  • 1327
Supreme Court REFUSES to Hear Case on Secret Recording of Attorney-Client Calls 😳
  • ok logo

Скачать Supreme Court REFUSES to Hear Case on Secret Recording of Attorney-Client Calls 😳 бесплатно в качестве 4к (2к / 1080p)

У нас вы можете скачать бесплатно Supreme Court REFUSES to Hear Case on Secret Recording of Attorney-Client Calls 😳 или посмотреть видео с ютуба в максимальном доступном качестве.

Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Cкачать музыку Supreme Court REFUSES to Hear Case on Secret Recording of Attorney-Client Calls 😳 бесплатно в формате MP3:

Если иконки загрузки не отобразились, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если у вас возникли трудности с загрузкой, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с нами по контактам, указанным в нижней части страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса video2dn.com

Описание к видео Supreme Court REFUSES to Hear Case on Secret Recording of Attorney-Client Calls 😳

SHOCKING: Government Secretly Records Attorney-Client Calls for YEARS

The Supreme Court just made a decision that should terrify every American who believes in constitutional rights. For years, prosecutors in Kansas were secretly recording privileged attorney-client phone calls - one of the most sacred protections in our legal system - and NOBODY knew about it.

Steven Hohn discovered this massive violation of Sixth Amendment rights and took his case all the way to the highest court in the land. But in a stunning move, the Supreme Court refused to even hear the case, leaving a dangerous precedent that could open the floodgates to prosecutorial misconduct across the entire country.

Here's what makes this even more outrageous: Lower courts said Hohn had to prove he was specifically harmed by having his private conversations with his lawyer secretly recorded by the very people prosecuting him. Think about that for a second - how do you prove harm when you don't even know what private information was used against you?

The government's defense? They claimed inmates "basically consented" because they could have made their calls private but chose not to. This victim-blaming logic essentially says if you don't take extra steps to protect your constitutional rights, the government can violate them with impunity.

This isn't just about one case in Kansas. This Supreme Court decision sends a chilling message to prosecutors nationwide that they can potentially get away with similar violations of attorney-client privilege - the very foundation of our adversarial justice system.

What does this mean for the future of constitutional protections? How many other jurisdictions might be doing this right now? And why won't the Supreme Court step in to protect one of our most fundamental rights?

Let me know in the comments what you think about this deeply troubling development in our justice system.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео

  • О нас
  • Контакты
  • Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer
  • Условия использования сайта - TOS
  • Политика конфиденциальности

video2dn Copyright © 2023 - 2025

Контакты для правообладателей [email protected]