Скачать или смотреть Cheapest Vs Most Expensive Shark Tank Pitches😱

Shark Tank India me har tarah ke founders funding lene aate hain—kisi ko ₹5 me equity dene se problem nahi, to koi ₹300 crore bhi kam samajhta hai. Iss video me humne aisi hi kuch cheapest aur most expensive pitches dekhi, jahan kuch founders ne sharks ko muskurane par majboor kar diya, to kuch ne gussa dilwa diya.

CHEAPEST PITCHES EVER:- Sabse sasti pitch thi Cocofit ki, jinhone apni company ke 5% equity ke badle sirf ₹5 maange. Business franchise based tha, jise risky maan kar Ashneer aur Piyush out ho gaye, lekin baaki sharks ne sasti deal samajh kar invest kiya. Lekin Cocofit se bhi sasti pitch thi Dhruv Vidyut ki, jinhone paise nahi balki sharks se 100 ghante maange apni 0.5% equity ke badle. Product bhi solid tha—jo 20 minute me normal cycle ko electric cycle me badal deta hai. Namita aur Vineeta time na de paane ke kaaran out ho gayi, lekin Aman, Anupam aur Piyush ne deal kar li.

Ek aur unique pitch thi Dharaksha ki, jinhone eco-friendly material banaya tha jo plastic aur thermocol ko replace kar sakta tha. Pehle sirf ₹1250 maange 1% equity ke liye, baad me 100 hours aur ₹2 crore future raise ka plan bataya. tab sharks thode confuse to huye or deal se piche hatne lage lekin founder's ke Clever jawab de kar sharks ko impress kar diya, aur deal bhi le li.

MOSE EXPENSIVE PITCHES EVAR:- Doosri taraf, QZens ka innovation revolutionary tha—ek aisi device jo bata sakti thi ki food kab kharab hoga. Lekin unki ₹400 crore ki valuation (₹1 crore for 0.25%) sunke sharks shocked ho gaye. Sales sirf ₹15 lakh thi, aur founders valuation justify nahi kar paaye. Isi wajah se deal nahi mili, sirf sharks ka gussa mila.

Phir aaye Hood app ke founders, jinhe ₹600 crore valuation chahiye thi. Sharks se valuation explain karne lage, jisse wo chidh gaye. User engagement bhi low tha, fir bhi Aman aur Piyush ne ₹112 crore valuation par offer de diya.

Aur sabse expensive pitch thi Gopal 56 ki, jinhone ₹300 crore maange 25% equity ke liye. Jab pucha gaya paisa kisliye chahiye, toh vague jawab diya—California me shop kholne ke liye. Ashneer ne daant diya aur koi deal nahi mili, lekin marketing ka fayda le gaye.

To ab sawal aapke liye hai—agar aap sharks ki kursi par hote, to inme se kaunsa business aap avoid karte aur kyun? Comment karke zaroor batana!
.
.
Keywords:-
(Shark Tank India, most expensive pitch shark tank, cheapest Shark Tank India pitches, Ashneer Grover Shark Tank India, Cocofit ₹5 equity, Dhruv Vidyut innovation, Ashneer Grover failed investment, Gopal56 ₹300 crore ask, ₹5 equity deal Shark Tank, failed shark tank india deals, shark tank india loss, dark reality of shark tank india, Qzens device pitch, shark tank india scams, Hood App ₹600 crore valuation, Hood App ₹1.2 crore ask, shark tank india fights, cheapest vs most expensive pitch shark tank india, youtube video, aman gupta shark tank, namita thapar business, aman gupta shark tank, cheapest vs expensive, ashneer grover shark tank, anupam angry on founder, boat case study, anupam mittal failed investment, failed startups india, shark tank stories, shark tank india behind the scenes, shark tank india exposed, shark tank flop deals, Qzens device pitch, worst shark tank india startups, business failure india, shark tank india full analysis, shark tank india mistakes, fraud startup shark tank india, real truth of shark tank india, failed investments shark tank, business success stories, viral youtube shorts, business shorts, mr.marketar)
.
.
Social Media Handle:-
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/mr.marketar...
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/share/1FWVC1...
.
.
Copyright Disclaimer: - Under section 107 of the copyright Act 1976, allowance is mad for FAIR USE for purpose such a as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statues that might otherwise be infringing. Non- Profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of FAIR USE.