Скачать или смотреть MongoDB Data Localization in .NET: Which Approach to Choose?

Discover the best practices for handling `MongoDB` data localization in .NET C# , including querying and displaying data in multiple languages.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/61018341/ asked by the user 'Al-Hanash Moataz' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4669426/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63349703/ provided by the user 'Al-Hanash Moataz' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4669426/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: MongoDb Data Localization in .net c# for both querying and displaying

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
MongoDB Data Localization in .NET: Which Approach to Choose?

Handling multiple languages in your application can be challenging, especially when dealing with databases like MongoDB. While trying to localize data, you might face hurdles when users search for keywords in their native language, especially if the primary data is stored in English. In this guide, we'll explore a common pattern in data localization for a MongoDB collection, specifically focusing on its implications in a .NET C# application.

The Problem

Imagine you have a collection called Location, where you store geographic names in English. When users attempt to search for a location using Arabic or any other language, the direct comparison won't yield results since the data exists only in English. This limitation creates a significant barrier to user experience, and finding a solution is crucial.

Previous Solution

Initially, the user relied on external JSON files for translation to handle localization. This method allowed for easy addition of languages and provided a straightforward way to update translations. However, it neglected the ability to search data effectively based on user input in different languages.

Exploring Solutions

Upon identifying the problem, two potential approaches were proposed to enhance data localization in the application.

First Approach: In-Database Localization

This first approach integrates localization directly into the database schema. By extending the Location class, we can add a 2-dimensional array to store localized names for different languages.

Implementation Example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Sample Document Structure:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of the First Approach

Centralized Data: All translation data stored in one place makes retrieval easier.

Effective searching: Users can search for locations regardless of the language input.

Drawbacks

More complex structure: Increases the complexity of documents, potentially leading to storage inefficiencies.

Second Approach: External Localization with Queryable Text

The second approach keeps translations in separate JSON files while introducing a QueryableText field in the Location class. This field contains a concatenated string of all translatable labels.

Implementation Example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Sample Document Structure:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Keeping Translation JSON Files

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of the Second Approach

Simpler Document Structure: Documents are less complex as translations reside outside the database.

Easier Updates: Translation files can be updated independently from the database schema.

Drawbacks

Limited Searching: Depending on how the QueryableText is structured, there may be limitations in the search functionality.

Which Approach is Better?

The right choice depends on the specifics of your application:

If your application serves multiple organizations: The first approach is likely more suitable as it centralizes all localization data within the database, making it easier to manage across different user contexts.

If your app caters to a specific organization: The second approach could yield better performance, as it keeps the schema cleaner and relies on external JSON files for translations, allowing for easier manipulations and updates.

Conclusion

In conclusion, your decision should consider both the complexity of your application and the user experience. By weighing the benefits and drawbacks of each approach, you can effectively facilitate searching and displaying localized data in your .NET appli