Скачать или смотреть GitHub Copilot vs Cursor: Best AI Coding Assistant in 2025?

Developers are debating GitHub Copilot vs Cursor as two of the top AI-powered coding assistants in 2025. On the surface, they seem similar, but do they really perform the same? In this video, we run a head-to-head comparison on real-world coding tasks — from generating tests and building features to CI/CD analysis and handling errors.

We’ll cover speed, context understanding, integration with GitHub, and pricing so you can decide which tool is right for your workflow.

⏱️ Video Chapters:
0:00 Intro: Why compare GitHub Copilot & Cursor?
0:53 Setup: Same repo opened, selecting models for both tools
1:33 Test 1: Generating test cases with Playwright for a Next.js project
4:05 Cursor vs Copilot: Speed & feature generation
5:10 Test 2: Adding test IDs and analyzing components
6:30 CI/CD workflow analysis: Checking runs & failure rates
8:24 Test 3: Pricing comparison & subscription plans
9:45 Test 4: Building new features and insights tab
12:00 Cursor: To-do list & automatic task execution
13:10 Copilot: Context analysis & code suggestions
15:00 Build completion: UI rendering & errors handled
16:30 Final comparison: Speed, integration, and workflow efficiency
17:30 Conclusion: Which AI coding assistant fits different developer scenarios?

💡 Why this matters in 2025:
AI coding assistants are becoming essential for developers. Choosing the right tool can impact speed, collaboration, and code quality. GitHub Copilot and Cursor both promise AI-native coding workflows — but each has its strengths and trade-offs.

📌 Tools featured:
GitHub Copilot: AI coding assistant integrated directly with your editor, strong GitHub integration
Cursor: AI-native IDE with speed, task automation, and to-do list for feature building

👉 If you’re exploring AI coding assistants this year, this breakdown will help you choose the one that best matches your workflow.

#GitHubCopilot #CursorAI #AICodingAssistant #CodeGeneration #DevTools2025